Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

BAMU and PULS

BAMUBrookstone×PULSPGIM×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$12,424PULS · best of the two

02 / 04

BAMU and PULS, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETFBonds & Cash · Ultra-short0.15%4.35%+3.4%+4.1%+5.3%+4.4%−0.1%0.4%$19.8B1.0

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETFBonds & Cash · Ultra-short0.95%2.90%+2.3%+2.7%+3.4%[…]−0.6%1.1%$66M2.0

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: BAMU 2023 · PULS 2018

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF · $66M$10,268

BAMU

PULS

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF · $19.8B$10,414

$10,000 one year ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

BAMUMeasurePULS

+2.3%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 9+3.4%

+2.7%1 yearTotal return+4.1%

+3.4%3 years · per year$10,000 became $11,062 · $11,666+5.3%

[…]5 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $12,424+4.4%

0.95%Expense ratio$95 · $15 a year on $10k · lower is better0.15%

2.90%Trailing 12-mo yield$290 · $435 a year on $10k4.35%

−0.6%Worst dropSmaller is better−0.1%

1.1%VolatilityLower is calmer0.4%

BAMUPULS Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

0–7PULS wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

BAMU vs PULS: Top 5 Holdings

Today

BAMU

98.9%in top 5

PULS

in top 52.3%

BAMUStockPULS

19.8%IBTGnot top 5

19.8%TBLLnot top 5

19.8%SGOVnot top 5

19.7%BILnot top 5

19.7%BILSnot top 5

not top 5PAAA2.3%

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · share of each fund

BAMU vs PULS Returns, Every Period

BrookstoneBAMU

+2.7%

past year

PULSPGIM

+4.1%

past year

BAMUPULSFaded: behind in that period

0–3PULS wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

BAMU vs PULS

YTD

BrookstoneBAMU

+2.3%

PULSPGIM

+3.4%

+2.3%Year to date+3.4%

−0.6%Worst drop · 1Y−0.1%

1.1%Volatility · 1Y0.4%

2.9%Yield4.4%

$66.1MAssets$19.8B

4–0PULS wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: BAMU, PULS

Today

0.15%lowest, PULS

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

PULS0.15%$15

BAMU0.95%$95

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: BAMU, PULS

4.35%highest, PULS

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

PULS4.35%$435

BAMU2.90%$290

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$420most kept, PULS

PULS$435 − $15 = $420

BAMU$290 − $95 = $195

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: BAMU, PULS

Today

0.0%most shared, BAMU and PULS

BAMUPULS

BAMU—0.0%

PULS0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+4.1%PULS, at 0.4% volatility

PULSWorst drop−0.1%0.4% vol

BAMUWorst drop−0.6%1.1% vol

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

PULSBAMU

+3.4%Year to date+2.3%

4.4%Yield2.9%

+4.1%Past year+2.7%

0.15%Fee0.95%

4–0PULS wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+33.2%

VIGVanguard

+14.8%

+33.2%Year to date+14.8%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$122BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+6.6%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.5%

+6.6%Year to date+7.5%

12.4%Yield7.9%

$40.7BAssets$45.2B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.3%

SPYSPDR

+11.2%

+11.3%Year to date+11.2%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$179BAssets$778B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 9, 2026