Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

ROM and QLD

ROMProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth1Y$10,000 one year agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$10,753ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

ROM and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.04%+13.7%+7.5%+40.5%+13.2%−37.3%57.2%$1.1B1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.17%+2.8%+0.1%+37.1%+11.8%−28.3%42.6%$12.8B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: ROM 2007 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $1.1B$18,618

ROM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $12.8B$17,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 40.4% in common

ROMMeasureQLD

+13.7%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 5+2.8%

+7.5%1 yearTotal return+0.1%

+40.5%3 years · per year$10,000 became $27,720 · $25,792+37.1%

+13.2%5 years · per year$10,000 became $18,618 · $17,482+11.8%

0.93%Expense ratio$93 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.04%Trailing 12-mo yield$4 · $17 a year on $10k0.17%

−37.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−28.3%

57.2%VolatilityLower is calmer42.6%

ROMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

ROM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

ROM

34.1%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

ROMStockQLD

3.3%IQMM11.4%

10.0%AAPL5.8%

9.5%NVDA5.5%

8.1%MSFT4.7%

not top 5AMZN3.3%

3.0%AVGOnot top 5

Held in common40.4%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share of each fund

ROM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesROM

+13.2%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+11.8%

5 years, per year

ROMQLDFaded: behind in that period

4–0ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

ROM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesROM

+13.7%

QLDProShares

+2.8%

+13.7%Year to date+2.8%

−37.3%Worst drop · 1Y−28.3%

57.2%Volatility · 1Y42.6%

0.0%Yield0.2%

$1.1BAssets$12.8B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: ROM, QLD

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

QLD0.96%$96

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: ROM, QLD

0.17%highest, QLD

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QLD0.17%$17

ROM0.04%$4

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$79most kept, QLD

QLD$17 − $96 = −$79

ROM$4 − $93 = −$89

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: ROM, QLD

Today

40.4%most shared, ROM and QLD

ROMQLD

ROM—40.4%

QLD40.4%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+7.5%ROM, at 57.2% volatility

QLDWorst drop−28.3%42.6% vol

ROMWorst drop−37.3%57.2% vol

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QLDROM

+2.8%Year to date+13.7%

0.2%Yield0.0%

+0.1%Past year+7.5%

0.96%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.1BAssets$46.1B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.4%

SPYSPDR

+8.3%

+8.4%Year to date+8.3%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$805B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026