Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

LMUB and BND

LMUBiShares×BNDVanguard×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

−0.1%

IWD+0.2%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth3Y$10,000 three years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$11,293BND · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeBND · 4.18% · $418 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

LMUB and BND, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETFBonds & Cash · Core aggregate0.03%4.18%−1.5%−1.4%+4.1%−0.5%−4.5%4.1%$161B1.1

iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETFBonds & Cash · Municipal0.09%4.01%−1.4%−1.4%[…][…]−9.5%5.5%$2.0B1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: LMUB 2025 · BND 2007

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF · $2.0B[…]

LMUB

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF · $161B$9,762

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

LMUBMeasureBND

−1.4%

More Ways to See the Pairs

LMUB vs BND: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LMUB

[…]in top 5

BND

in top 5[…]

Holdings […] not in today’s data

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share of each fund

LMUB vs BND Returns, Every Period

1Y

iSharesLMUB

−1.4%

past year

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: LMUB, BND

Today

0.03%lowest, BND

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

BND0.03%$3

LMUB0.09%$9

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: LMUB, BND

1Y

4.18%highest, BND

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

BND vs AGG

YTD

VanguardBND

−1.5%

AGGiShares

−1.5%

−1.5%Year to date−1.5%

4.2%Yield4.2%

$161BAssets$137B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.9%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+6.7%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.2%

Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 13

−1.5%

−1.4%1 yearTotal return−1.4%

[…]3 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $11,293+4.1%

[…]5 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $9,762−0.5%

0.09%Expense ratio$9 · $3 a year on $10k · lower is better0.03%

4.01%Trailing 12-mo yield$401 · $418 a year on $10k4.18%

−9.5%Worst dropSmaller is better−4.5%

5.5%VolatilityLower is calmer4.1%

LMUBBND Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

1–4BND wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

BND

Vanguard

−1.4%

past year

LMUBBNDFaded: behind in that period

1–0LMUB wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LMUB vs BND

YTD

iSharesLMUB

−1.4%

BNDVanguard

−1.5%

−1.4%Year to date−1.5%

−9.5%Worst drop · 1Y−4.5%

5.5%Volatility · 1Y4.1%

4.0%Yield4.2%

$2.0BAssets$161B

3–1BND wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

BND4.18%$418

LMUB4.01%$401

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$415most kept, BND

BND$418 − $3 = $415

LMUB$401 − $9 = $392

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: LMUB, BND

Today

[…]holdings […]

LMUBBND

LMUB—[…]

BND[…]—

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

−1.4%BND, at 4.1% volatility

BNDWorst drop−4.5%4.1% vol

LMUBWorst drop−9.5%5.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

BNDLMUB

−1.5%Year to date−1.4%

4.2%Yield4.0%

−1.4%Past year−1.4%

0.03%Fee0.09%

2–1BND wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

+34.9%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$124BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

+6.7%Year to date+8.2%

12.4%Yield7.9%

$42.6BAssets$47.3B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Loading…

LMUB and BND

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two