Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

ROM and QLD

ROMProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth3Y$10,000 three years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$33,421ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

ROM and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.03%+35.2%+21.2%+49.5%+17.7%−31.3%54.8%$1.1B1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+17.8%+10.0%+44.0%+15.4%−24.1%40.5%$12.8B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: ROM 2007 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $1.1B$22,582

ROM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $12.8B$20,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 41.2% in common

ROMMeasureQLD

+35.2%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+17.8%

+21.2%1 yearTotal return+10.0%

+49.5%3 years · per year$10,000 became $33,421 · $29,852+44.0%

+17.7%5 years · per year$10,000 became $22,582 · $20,482+15.4%

0.93%Expense ratio$93 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.03%Trailing 12-mo yield$3 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−31.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

54.8%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

ROMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

ROM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

ROM

33.4%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.6%

ROMStockQLD

3.3%IQMM11.5%

9.8%NVDA5.8%

9.5%AAPL5.6%

7.6%MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

3.1%AVGOnot top 5

Held in common41.2%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

ROM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesROM

+17.7%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.4%

5 years, per year

ROMQLDFaded: behind in that period

4–0ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

ROM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesROM

+35.2%

QLDProShares

+17.8%

+35.2%Year to date+17.8%

−31.3%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

54.8%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

0.0%Yield0.1%

$1.1BAssets$12.8B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: ROM, QLD

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

QLD0.96%$96

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: ROM, QLD

0.15%highest, QLD

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QLD0.15%$15

ROM0.03%$3

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$81most kept, QLD

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

ROM$3 − $93 = −$90

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: ROM, QLD

Today

41.2%most shared, ROM and QLD

ROMQLD

ROM—41.2%

QLD41.2%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+21.2%ROM, at 54.8% volatility

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

ROMWorst drop−31.3%54.8% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QLDROM

+17.8%Year to date+35.2%

0.1%Yield0.0%

+10.0%Past year+21.2%

0.96%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$42.1BAssets$46.1B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$805B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026