Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

BIB and QLD

BIBProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,204QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

BIB and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq BiotechnologyLeveraged · 2x1.17%0.19%+49.0%+66.5%+44.6%+6.0%−17.9%44.7%$102M1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+15.6%+8.9%+44.1%+15.1%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: BIB 2010 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology · $102M$13,367

BIB

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,204

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 13.8% in common

BIBMeasureQLD

+49.0%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+15.6%

+66.5%1 yearTotal return+8.9%

+44.6%3 years · per year$10,000 became $30,262 · $29,937+44.1%

+6.0%5 years · per year$10,000 became $13,367 · $20,204+15.1%

1.17%Expense ratio$117 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.19%Trailing 12-mo yield$19 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−17.9%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

44.7%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

BIBQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3BIB wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

BIB vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

BIB

36.6%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

BIBStockQLD

16.9%IQMM11.1%

not top 5AAPL5.9%

not top 5NVDA5.9%

5.6%GILDnot top 5

5.2%AMGNnot top 5

4.9%VRTXnot top 5

not top 5MSFT4.5%

3.9%REGNnot top 5

not top 5AMZN3.2%

Held in common13.8%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

BIB vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesBIB

+6.0%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.1%

5 years, per year

BIBQLDFaded: behind in that period

3–1BIB wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

BIB vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesBIB

+49.0%

QLDProShares

+15.6%

+49.0%Year to date+15.6%

−17.9%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

44.7%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

0.2%Yield0.2%

$102MAssets$13.2B

2–1BIB wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: BIB, QLD

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

BIB1.17%$117

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: BIB, QLD

0.19%highest, BIB

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

BIB0.19%$19

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$81most kept, QLD

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

BIB$19 − $117 = −$98

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: BIB, QLD

Today

13.8%most shared, BIB and QLD

BIBQLD

BIB—13.8%

QLD13.8%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+66.5%BIB, at 44.7% volatility

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

BIBWorst drop−17.9%44.7% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

BIBQLD

+49.0%Year to date+15.6%

0.2%Yield0.2%

+66.5%Past year+8.9%

1.17%Fee0.96%

2–1BIB wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026