Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

CHAU and QLD

CHAUDirexion×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,204QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

CHAU and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+15.6%+8.9%+44.1%+15.1%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.3

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X SharesLeveraged · 2x1.19%2.91%−20.1%−18.0%+7.1%−14.3%−36.6%35.9%$69M1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: CHAU 2015 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares · $69M$4,610

CHAU

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,204

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

CHAUMeasureQLD

−20.1%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+15.6%

−18.0%1 yearTotal return+8.9%

+7.1%3 years · per year$10,000 became $12,277 · $29,937+44.1%

−14.3%5 years · per year$10,000 became $4,610 · $20,204+15.1%

1.19%Expense ratio$119 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

2.91%Trailing 12-mo yield$291 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−36.6%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

35.9%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

CHAUQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

2–6QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

CHAU vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

CHAU

18.7%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

CHAUStockQLD

18.7%ASHRnot top 5

not top 5IQMM11.1%

not top 5AAPL5.9%

not top 5NVDA5.9%

not top 5MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

CHAU vs QLD Returns, Every Period

DirexionCHAU

−14.3%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.1%

5 years, per year

CHAUQLDFaded: behind in that period

0–4QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

CHAU vs QLD

YTD

DirexionCHAU

−20.1%

QLDProShares

+15.6%

−20.1%Year to date+15.6%

−36.6%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

35.9%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

2.9%Yield0.2%

$69.1MAssets$13.2B

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: CHAU, QLD

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

CHAU1.19%$119

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: CHAU, QLD

2.91%highest, CHAU

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

CHAU2.91%$291

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$172most kept, CHAU

CHAU$291 − $119 = $172

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: CHAU, QLD

Today

0.0%most shared, CHAU and QLD

CHAUQLD

CHAU—0.0%

QLD0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+8.9%QLD, at 40.5% volatility

CHAUWorst drop−36.6%35.9% vol

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

CHAUQLD

−20.1%Year to date+15.6%

2.9%Yield0.2%

−18.0%Past year+8.9%

1.19%Fee0.96%

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026