Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

CWEB and QLD

CWEBDirexion×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,482QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

CWEB and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+17.8%+10.0%+44.0%+15.4%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.1

Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2X ETFLeveraged · 2x1.27%8.44%−54.8%−63.6%−15.3%−37.6%−68.0%53.0%$150M1.9

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: CWEB 2016 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2X ETF · $150M$947

CWEB

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

CWEBMeasureQLD

−54.8%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+17.8%

−63.6%1 yearTotal return+10.0%

−15.3%3 years · per year$10,000 became $6,069 · $29,852+44.0%

−37.6%5 years · per year$10,000 became $947 · $20,482+15.4%

1.27%Expense ratio$127 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

8.44%Trailing 12-mo yield$844 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−68.0%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

53.0%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

CWEBQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

1–7QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

CWEB vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

CWEB

26.6%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.6%

CWEBStockQLD

26.6%KWEBnot top 5

not top 5IQMM11.5%

not top 5NVDA5.8%

not top 5AAPL5.6%

not top 5MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

CWEB vs QLD Returns, Every Period

DirexionCWEB

−37.6%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.4%

5 years, per year

CWEBQLDFaded: behind in that period

0–4QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

CWEB vs QLD

YTD

DirexionCWEB

−54.8%

QLDProShares

+17.8%

−54.8%Year to date+17.8%

−68.0%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

53.0%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

8.4%Yield0.1%

$150MAssets$13.2B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: CWEB, QLD

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

CWEB1.27%$127

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: CWEB, QLD

8.44%highest, CWEB

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

CWEB8.44%$844

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$717most kept, CWEB

CWEB$844 − $127 = $717

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: CWEB, QLD

Today

0.0%most shared, CWEB and QLD

CWEBQLD

CWEB—0.0%

QLD0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+10.0%QLD, at 40.5% volatility

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

CWEBWorst drop−68.0%53.0% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

CWEBQLD

−54.8%Year to date+17.8%

8.4%Yield0.1%

−63.6%Past year+10.0%

1.27%Fee0.96%

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026