Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

FEBM and BAPR

FEBMFirst Trust×BAPRInnovator×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

−0.1%

BNDX−0.1%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$16,567BAPR · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeFEBM · 0.00% · $0 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

FEBM and BAPR, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFDefined Outcome · Buffer0.79%0.00%+14.0%+15.6%+15.4%+10.6%−2.5%6.5%$415M1.3

First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - FebruaryDefined Outcome · Buffer0.85%0.00%+4.8%+5.8%[…][…]−1.7%2.4%$47M1.5

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: FEBM 2025 · BAPR 2019

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VIII - FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February · $47M[…]

FEBM

BAPR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · $415M$16,567

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

FEBMMeasureBAPR

+4.8%

More Ways to See the Pairs

FEBM vs BAPR: Top 5 Holdings

Today

FEBM

[…]in top 5

BAPR

in top 5[…]

Holdings […] not in today’s data

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share of each fund

FEBM vs BAPR Returns, Every Period

1Y

First TrustFEBM

+5.8%

past year

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: FEBM, BAPR

Today

0.79%lowest, BAPR

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

BAPR0.79%$79

FEBM0.85%$85

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: FEBM, BAPR

1Y

0.00%highest, FEBM

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.9%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

+34.9%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$124BAssets$116B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+6.7%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.2%

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 13

+14.0%

+5.8%1 yearTotal return+15.6%

[…]3 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $15,354+15.4%

[…]5 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $16,567+10.6%

0.85%Expense ratio$85 · $79 a year on $10k · lower is better0.79%

0.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$0 · $0 a year on $10k0.00%

−1.7%Worst dropSmaller is better−2.5%

2.4%VolatilityLower is calmer6.5%

FEBMBAPR Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

2–3BAPR wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

BAPR

Innovator

+15.6%

past year

FEBMBAPRFaded: behind in that period

0–2BAPR wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

FEBM vs BAPR

YTD

First TrustFEBM

+4.8%

BAPRInnovator

+14.0%

+4.8%Year to date+14.0%

−1.7%Worst drop · 1Y−2.5%

2.4%Volatility · 1Y6.5%

0.0%Yield0.0%

$47.0MAssets$415M

2–1FEBM wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

FEBM0.00%$0

BAPR0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

−$79most kept, BAPR

BAPR$0 − $79 = −$79

FEBM$0 − $85 = −$85

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: FEBM, BAPR

Today

[…]holdings […]

FEBMBAPR

FEBM—[…]

BAPR[…]—

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

+15.6%BAPR, at 6.5% volatility

FEBMWorst drop−1.7%2.4% vol

BAPRWorst drop−2.5%6.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

FEBMBAPR

+4.8%Year to date+14.0%

0.0%Yield0.0%

+5.8%Past year+15.6%

0.85%Fee0.79%

3–0BAPR wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

+6.7%Year to date+8.2%

12.4%Yield7.9%

$42.1BAssets$47.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Year to date

+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$186BAssets$807B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Loading…

FEBM and BAPR

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two