Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

FIDU and VIS

FIDUFidelity×VISVanguard×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

−0.1%

BNDX−0.1%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$16,799FIDU · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeVIS · 0.95% · $95 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

FIDU and VIS, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Vanguard Industrials ETFSectors · Industrials0.09%0.95%+9.4%+9.9%+20.1%+10.9%−13.5%19.2%$7.7B1.3

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETFSectors · Industrials0.08%0.93%+9.3%+9.8%+20.0%+10.9%−13.6%19.3%$2.3B1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: FIDU 2013 · VIS 2004

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

Vanguard Industrials ETF · $7.7B$16,773

VIS

FIDU

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF · $2.3B$16,799

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 87.3% in common

VISMeasureFIDU

+9.4%

More Ways to See the Pairs

VIS vs FIDU: Top 5 Holdings

Today

VIS

20.5%in top 5

FIDU

in top 519.4%

VISStockFIDU

5.6%CAT4.1%

4.9%GE5.3%

3.7%RTX4.0%

3.8%GEV3.2%

not top 5UNP

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: FIDU, VIS

Today

0.08%lowest, FIDU

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

FIDU0.08%$8

VIS0.09%$9

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: FIDU, VIS

1Y

0.95%highest, VIS

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.9%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

+34.9%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$124BAssets$116B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+6.7%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.2%

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 13

+9.3%

+9.9%1 yearTotal return+9.8%

+20.1%3 years · per year$10,000 became $17,322 · $17,276+20.0%

+10.9%5 years · per year$10,000 became $16,773 · $16,799+10.9%

0.09%Expense ratio$9 · $8 a year on $10k · lower is better0.08%

0.95%Trailing 12-mo yield$95 · $93 a year on $10k0.93%

−13.5%Worst dropSmaller is better−13.6%

19.2%VolatilityLower is calmer19.3%

VISFIDU Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

6–1VIS wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

2.7%

2.5%ETNnot top 5

Held in common87.3%

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share of each fund

VIS vs FIDU Returns, Every Period

5Y

VanguardVIS

+10.9%

5 years, per year

FIDUFidelity

+10.9%

5 years, per year

VISFIDUFaded: behind in that period

3–0VIS wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

VIS vs FIDU

YTD

VanguardVIS

+9.4%

FIDUFidelity

+9.3%

+9.4%Year to date+9.3%

−13.5%Worst drop · 1Y−13.6%

19.2%Volatility · 1Y19.3%

0.9%Yield0.9%

$7.7BAssets$2.3B

3–0VIS wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

VIS0.95%$95

FIDU0.93%$93

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$86most kept, VIS

VIS$95 − $9 = $86

FIDU$93 − $8 = $85

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: FIDU, VIS

Today

87.3%most shared, FIDU and VIS

FIDUVIS

FIDU—87.3%

VIS87.3%—

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

+9.9%VIS, at 19.2% volatility

VISWorst drop−13.5%19.2% vol

FIDUWorst drop−13.6%19.3% vol

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

VISFIDU

+9.4%Year to date+9.3%

0.9%Yield0.9%

+9.9%Past year+9.8%

0.09%Fee0.08%

2–1VIS wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

+6.7%Year to date+8.2%

12.4%Yield7.9%

$42.1BAssets$47.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Year to date

+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$186BAssets$807B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Loading…

FIDU and VIS

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two