Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

FQAL and MTUM

FQALFidelity×MTUMiShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$17,195FQAL · best of the two

02 / 04

FQAL and MTUM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Fidelity Quality Factor ETFUS Stock Styles · Factor0.15%1.14%+13.1%+14.0%+22.4%+11.5%−8.4%11.5%$1.4B1.1

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFUS Stock Styles · Factor0.15%0.68%+9.4%+8.4%+26.9%+9.1%−20.8%27.9%$17.4B1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: FQAL 2016 · MTUM 2013

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · $1.4B$17,195

FQAL

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · $17.4B$15,425

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 21.9% in common

FQALMeasureMTUM

+13.1%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+9.4%

+14.0%1 yearTotal return+8.4%

+22.4%3 years · per year$10,000 became $18,343 · $20,414+26.9%

+11.5%5 years · per year$10,000 became $17,195 · $15,425+9.1%

0.15%Expense ratio$15 · $15 a year on $10k · lower is better0.15%

1.14%Trailing 12-mo yield$114 · $68 a year on $10k0.68%

−8.4%Worst dropSmaller is better−20.8%

11.5%VolatilityLower is calmer27.9%

FQALMTUM Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

6–1FQAL wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

FQAL vs MTUM: Top 5 Holdings

Today

FQAL

28.5%in top 5

MTUM

in top 521.0%

FQALStockMTUM

7.7%NVDAnot top 5

7.6%AAPLnot top 5

6.2%MSFTnot top 5

not top 5AMD5.6%

not top 5MU5.0%

4.3%GOOGLnot top 5

not top 5JNJ3.7%

not top 5CSCO3.6%

not top 5XOM3.1%

2.8%AVGOnot top 5

Held in common21.9%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

FQAL vs MTUM Returns, Every Period

FidelityFQAL

+11.5%

5 years, per year

MTUMiShares

+9.1%

5 years, per year

FQALMTUMFaded: behind in that period

3–1FQAL wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

FQAL vs MTUM

YTD

FidelityFQAL

+13.1%

MTUMiShares

+9.4%

+13.1%Year to date+9.4%

−8.4%Worst drop · 1Y−20.8%

11.5%Volatility · 1Y27.9%

1.1%Yield0.7%

$1.4BAssets$17.4B

4–0FQAL wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: FQAL, MTUM

Today

0.15%lowest, FQAL

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

FQAL0.15%$15

MTUM0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: FQAL, MTUM

1.14%highest, FQAL

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

FQAL1.14%$114

MTUM0.68%$68

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$99most kept, FQAL

FQAL$114 − $15 = $99

MTUM$68 − $15 = $53

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: FQAL, MTUM

Today

21.9%most shared, FQAL and MTUM

FQALMTUM

FQAL—21.9%

MTUM21.9%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+14.0%FQAL, at 11.5% volatility

FQALWorst drop−8.4%11.5% vol

MTUMWorst drop−20.8%27.9% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

FQALMTUM

+13.1%Year to date+9.4%

1.1%Yield0.7%

+14.0%Past year+8.4%

0.15%Fee0.15%

3–0FQAL wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026