Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

IWF and CPRO

IWFiShares×CPROCalamos×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

IWD−0.4%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$15,697IWF · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeIWF · 0.37% · $37 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

IWF and CPRO, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberUS Stock Styles · Small cap0.69%0.00%+6.6%+7.3%[…][…]−1.5%2.9%$27M1.3

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFUS Stock Styles · Growth0.18%0.37%−1.5%−3.0%+19.2%+9.4%−14.6%19.6%$119B1.5

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: IWF 2000 · CPRO 2024

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · $119B$15,697

IWF

CPRO

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October · $27M[…]

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

IWFMeasureCPRO

−1.5%

More Ways to See the Pairs

IWF vs CPRO: Top 5 Holdings

Today

IWF

38.2%in top 5

CPRO

in top 5[…]

IWFStockCPRO

12.8%NVDAnot top 5

8.8%AAPLnot top 5

6.1%MSFTnot top 5

5.4%GOOGLnot top 5

5.1%AVGOnot top 5

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: IWF, CPRO

Today

0.18%lowest, IWF

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

IWF0.18%$18

CPRO0.69%$69

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: IWF, CPRO

1Y

0.37%highest, IWF

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

VUG vs SCHG

YTD

VanguardVUG

+4.9%

SCHGSchwab

+5.6%

+4.9%Year to date+5.6%

0.03% · $3Fee · on $10k a year0.04% · $4

$233BAssets$61.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.2%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.8%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.3%

Year to date

Jan 1 → Nov 12

+6.6%

−3.0%1 yearTotal return+7.3%

+19.2%3 years · per year$10,000 became $16,957 · […][…]

+9.4%5 years · per year$10,000 became $15,697 · […][…]

0.18%Expense ratio$18 · $69 a year on $10k · lower is better0.69%

0.37%Trailing 12-mo yield$37 · $0 a year on $10k0.00%

−14.6%Worst dropSmaller is better−1.5%

19.6%VolatilityLower is calmer2.9%

IWFCPRO Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

2–4CPRO wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · share of each fund

IWF vs CPRO Returns, Every Period

1Y

iSharesIWF

−3.0%

past year

CPROCalamos

+7.3%

past year

IWFCPROFaded: behind in that period

0–2CPRO wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

IWF vs CPRO

YTD

iSharesIWF

−1.5%

CPROCalamos

+6.6%

−1.5%Year to date+6.6%

−14.6%Worst drop · 1Y−1.5%

19.6%Volatility · 1Y2.9%

0.4%Yield0.0%

$119BAssets$26.8M

3–1CPRO wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

IWF0.37%$37

CPRO0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$19most kept, IWF

IWF$37 − $18 = $19

CPRO$0 − $69 = −$69

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: IWF, CPRO

Today

[…]holdings […]

IWFCPRO

IWF—[…]

CPRO[…]—

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

+7.3%CPRO, at 2.9% volatility

CPROWorst drop−1.5%2.9% vol

IWFWorst drop−14.6%19.6% vol

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

IWFCPRO

−1.5%Year to date+6.6%

0.4%Yield0.0%

−3.0%Past year+7.3%

0.18%Fee0.69%

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

+34.2%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

+7.8%Year to date+8.3%

12.2%Yield7.9%

$41.8BAssets$46.8B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

Loading…

IWF and CPRO

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two