Compare · 4 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

LIT, ACES, CIBR and SMH

LITGlobal X×ACESALPS×CIBRFirst Trust×SMHVanEck×

02 / 04

Search ETFs and stocks

Story of the four · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · all four on one scale$36,977SMH · best of the four

Story of the four · IncomeMost incomeLIT · 0.82% · $82 a year on $10k

Story of the four · RiskSmallest drop

LIT, ACES, CIBR and SMH, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

VanEck Semiconductor ETFThematic · AI & semis0.35%0.22%+40.8%+41.7%+50.8%+29.9%−33.1%43.2%$63.5B1.9

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETFThematic · Cyber & cloud0.58%0.41%+35.0%+26.1%+29.1%+12.6%−20.6%31.3%$16.4B2.1

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.75%0.82%−5.4%−1.4%+8.1%−7.3%−34.4%30.3%$1.1B2.6

ALPS Clean Energy ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.55%0.68%−15.0%−22.9%−3.3%−18.7%−40.5%33.2%$91M3.4

Rank among the four1st → 4thFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: LIT 2010 · ACES 2018 · CIBR 2015 · SMH 2011

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · $1.1B$6,854

LIT

More Ways to See the Pairs

LIT vs ACES: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LIT

38.6%in top 5

ACES

in top 530.1%

LITStockACES

20.0%RIOnot top 5

not top 5NXT6.6%

not top 5CWEN6.1%

not top 5NPI.TO6.0%

not top 5ITRI5.8%

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: LIT, ACES, CIBR, SMH

Today

0.35%lowest, SMH

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

SMH0.35%$35

ACES0.55%$55

CIBR0.58%$58

LIT0.75%$75

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Popular Pairs Near These Four

SOXX vs SMH

YTD

iSharesSOXX

+55.1%

SMHVanEck

+40.8%

+55.1%Year to date+40.8%

0.33% · $33Fee · on $10k a year0.35% · $35

$41.4BAssets$63.5B

2–0SOXX wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.6%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.1%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.6%

ACES

ALPS Clean Energy ETF · $91M$3,550

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 8.6% in common

LITMeasureACES

−5.4%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 11−15.0%

−1.4%1 yearTotal return−22.9%

+8.1%3 years · per year$10,000 became $12,620 · $9,044−3.3%

−7.3%5 years · per year$10,000 became $6,854 · $3,550−18.7%

0.75%Expense ratio$75 · $55 a year on $10k · lower is better0.55%

0.82%Trailing 12-mo yield$82 · $68 a year on $10k0.68%

−34.4%Worst dropSmaller is better−40.5%

30.3%VolatilityLower is calmer33.2%

LITACES Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

7–1LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

4.6%TSLA5.6%

5.5%ALBnot top 5

4.4%300014.Snot top 5

4.2%1211.HKnot top 5

Held in common8.6%

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · share of each fund

LIT vs ACES Returns, Every Period

5Y

Global XLIT

−7.3%

5 years, per year

ACESALPS

−18.7%

5 years, per year

LITACESFaded: behind in that period

4–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LIT vs ACES

YTD

Global XLIT

−5.4%

ACESALPS

−15.0%

−5.4%Year to date−15.0%

−34.4%Worst drop · 1Y−40.5%

30.3%Volatility · 1Y33.2%

0.8%Yield0.7%

$1.1BAssets$90.8M

4–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Yields: LIT, ACES, CIBR, SMH

1Y

0.82%highest, LIT

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LIT0.82%$82

ACES0.68%$68

CIBR0.41%$41

SMH0.22%$22

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$13most kept, ACES

ACES$68 − $55 = $13

LIT$82 − $75 = $7

SMH$22 − $35 = −$13

CIBR$41 − $58 = −$17

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: LIT, ACES, CIBR, SMH

Today

8.6%most shared, LIT and ACES

LITACESCIBRSMH

LIT—8.6%0.0%0.0%

ACES8.6%—0.0%0.0%

CIBR0.0%0.0%—6.2%

SMH0.0%0.0%6.2%—

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 4 ETFs

1Y

+41.7%SMH, at 43.2% volatility

LITWorst drop−34.4%30.3% vol

CIBRWorst drop−20.6%31.3% vol

ACESWorst drop−40.5%33.2% vol

SMHWorst drop−33.1%43.2% vol

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LITSMH

−5.4%Year to date+40.8%

0.8%Yield0.2%

−1.4%Past year+41.7%

0.75%Fee0.35%

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026

+34.6%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026

+8.1%Year to date+8.6%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$42.0BAssets$46.6B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026

Loading…

LIT, ACES, CIBR and SMH

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Four