Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

LIT and CNQQ

LITGlobal X×CNQQRayliant×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$6,907LIT · best of the two

02 / 04

LIT and CNQQ, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.75%0.83%−5.7%+0.9%+9.8%−7.1%−34.4%30.3%$1.1B1.3

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETFThematic · China0.75%0.50%−17.6%−19.3%[…][…]−32.2%26.5%$44M1.5

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: LIT 2010 · CNQQ 2025

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · $1.1B$6,907

LIT

CNQQ

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF · $44M[…]

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 6.3% in common

LITMeasureCNQQ

−5.7%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 6−17.6%

+0.9%1 yearTotal return−19.3%

+9.8%3 years · per year$10,000 became $13,236 · […][…]

−7.1%5 years · per year$10,000 became $6,907 · […][…]

0.75%Expense ratio$75 · $75 a year on $10k · lower is better0.75%

0.83%Trailing 12-mo yield$83 · $50 a year on $10k0.50%

−34.4%Worst dropSmaller is better−32.2%

30.3%VolatilityLower is calmer26.5%

LITCNQQ Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–2LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

LIT vs CNQQ: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LIT

37.9%in top 5

CNQQ

in top 536.2%

LITStockCNQQ

19.2%RIOnot top 5

not top 50700.HK11.4%

not top 59988.HK11.4%

5.6%ALBnot top 5

not top 5300750.S5.5%

4.7%300014.Snot top 5

4.3%1211.HKnot top 5

not top 51810.HK4.3%

4.0%TSLAnot top 5

not top 53690.HK3.7%

Held in common6.3%

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share of each fund

LIT vs CNQQ Returns, Every Period

Global XLIT

+0.9%

past year

CNQQRayliant

−19.3%

past year

LITCNQQFaded: behind in that period

2–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LIT vs CNQQ

YTD

Global XLIT

−5.7%

CNQQRayliant

−17.6%

−5.7%Year to date−17.6%

−34.4%Worst drop · 1Y−32.2%

30.3%Volatility · 1Y26.5%

0.8%Yield0.5%

$1.1BAssets$43.8M

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: LIT, CNQQ

Today

0.75%lowest, LIT

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

LIT0.75%$75

CNQQ0.75%$75

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: LIT, CNQQ

0.83%highest, LIT

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LIT0.83%$83

CNQQ0.50%$50

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$8most kept, LIT

LIT$83 − $75 = $8

CNQQ$50 − $75 = −$25

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: LIT, CNQQ

Today

6.3%most shared, LIT and CNQQ

LITCNQQ

LIT—6.3%

CNQQ6.3%—

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+0.9%LIT, at 30.3% volatility

CNQQWorst drop−32.2%26.5% vol

LITWorst drop−34.4%30.3% vol

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LITCNQQ

−5.7%Year to date−17.6%

0.8%Yield0.5%

+0.9%Past year−19.3%

0.75%Fee0.75%

3–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+31.4%

VIGVanguard

+12.1%

+31.4%Year to date+12.1%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+3.2%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.3%

+3.2%Year to date+5.3%

12.8%Yield8.1%

$42.6BAssets$46.8B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.8%

SPYSPDR

+8.7%

+8.8%Year to date+8.7%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$819B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026