Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

LIT and TAN

LITGlobal X×TANInvesco×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$7,158LIT · best of the two

02 / 04

LIT and TAN, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.75%0.81%−4.2%+1.3%+9.8%−6.5%−34.4%30.5%$1.1B1.1

Invesco Solar ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.70%0.00%−6.8%−6.8%+3.7%−13.3%−45.6%38.7%$908M1.9

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: LIT 2010 · TAN 2008

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · $1.1B$7,158

LIT

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF · $908M$4,890

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

LITMeasureTAN

−4.2%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4−6.8%

+1.3%1 yearTotal return−6.8%

+9.8%3 years · per year$10,000 became $13,225 · $11,138+3.7%

−6.5%5 years · per year$10,000 became $7,158 · $4,890−13.3%

0.75%Expense ratio$75 · $70 a year on $10k · lower is better0.70%

0.81%Trailing 12-mo yield$81 · $0 a year on $10k0.00%

−34.4%Worst dropSmaller is better−45.6%

30.5%VolatilityLower is calmer38.7%

LITTAN Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

7–1LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

LIT vs TAN: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LIT

38.2%in top 5

TAN

in top 541.8%

LITStockTAN

19.4%RIOnot top 5

not top 5NXT12.6%

not top 5FSLR9.7%

not top 5ENLT.TA7.6%

not top 5ENPH6.7%

5.3%ALBnot top 5

not top 5HASI5.2%

4.8%TSLAnot top 5

4.5%300014.Snot top 5

4.2%1211.HKnot top 5

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

LIT vs TAN Returns, Every Period

Global XLIT

−6.5%

5 years, per year

TANInvesco

−13.3%

5 years, per year

LITTANFaded: behind in that period

4–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LIT vs TAN

YTD

Global XLIT

−4.2%

TANInvesco

−6.8%

−4.2%Year to date−6.8%

−34.4%Worst drop · 1Y−45.6%

30.5%Volatility · 1Y38.7%

0.8%Yield0.0%

$1.1BAssets$908M

4–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: LIT, TAN

Today

0.70%lowest, TAN

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

TAN0.70%$70

LIT0.75%$75

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: LIT, TAN

0.81%highest, LIT

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LIT0.81%$81

TAN0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$6most kept, LIT

LIT$81 − $75 = $6

TAN$0 − $70 = −$70

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: LIT, TAN

Today

0.0%most shared, LIT and TAN

LITTAN

LIT—0.0%

TAN0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+1.3%LIT, at 30.5% volatility

LITWorst drop−34.4%30.5% vol

TANWorst drop−45.6%38.7% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LITTAN

−4.2%Year to date−6.8%

0.8%Yield0.0%

+1.3%Past year−6.8%

0.75%Fee0.70%

3–1LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026