Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

LTL and ROM

LTLProShares×ROMProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$22,935ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

LTL and ROM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.03%+35.4%+22.3%+50.6%+18.1%−31.3%54.8%$1.1B1.3

ProShares Ultra Communication ServicesLeveraged · 2x1.83%1.40%−29.9%−26.7%+27.9%+14.5%−33.9%33.1%$4M1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: LTL 2008 · ROM 2007

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares Ultra Communication Services · $4M$19,662

LTL

ROM

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $1.1B$22,935

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

LTLMeasureROM

−29.9%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+35.4%

−26.7%1 yearTotal return+22.3%

+27.9%3 years · per year$10,000 became $20,910 · $34,190+50.6%

+14.5%5 years · per year$10,000 became $19,662 · $22,935+18.1%

1.83%Expense ratio$183 · $93 a year on $10k · lower is better0.93%

1.40%Trailing 12-mo yield$140 · $3 a year on $10k0.03%

−33.9%Worst dropSmaller is better−31.3%

33.1%VolatilityLower is calmer54.8%

LTLROM Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

2–6ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

LTL vs ROM: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LTL

26.7%in top 5

ROM

in top 533.9%

LTLStockROM

11.1%METAnot top 5

not top 5AAPL10.0%

not top 5NVDA9.9%

not top 5MSFT7.6%

5.6%GOOGLnot top 5

4.5%GOOGnot top 5

not top 5IQMM3.4%

not top 5AVGO3.1%

2.9%DISnot top 5

2.6%CMCSAnot top 5

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

LTL vs ROM Returns, Every Period

ProSharesLTL

+14.5%

5 years, per year

ROMProShares

+18.1%

5 years, per year

LTLROMFaded: behind in that period

0–4ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LTL vs ROM

YTD

ProSharesLTL

−29.9%

ROMProShares

+35.4%

−29.9%Year to date+35.4%

−33.9%Worst drop · 1Y−31.3%

33.1%Volatility · 1Y54.8%

1.4%Yield0.0%

$3.8MAssets$1.1B

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: LTL, ROM

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

LTL1.83%$183

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: LTL, ROM

1.40%highest, LTL

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LTL1.40%$140

ROM0.03%$3

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$43most kept, LTL

LTL$140 − $183 = −$43

ROM$3 − $93 = −$90

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: LTL, ROM

Today

0.0%most shared, LTL and ROM

LTLROM

LTL—0.0%

ROM0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+22.3%ROM, at 54.8% volatility

LTLWorst drop−33.9%33.1% vol

ROMWorst drop−31.3%54.8% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LTLROM

−29.9%Year to date+35.4%

1.4%Yield0.0%

−26.7%Past year+22.3%

1.83%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026