Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

NAPR and IVV

NAPRInnovator×IVViShares×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

IWD+0.0%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$17,414IVV · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeIVV · 1.11% · $111 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

NAPR and IVV, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

iShares Core S&P 500 ETFLow-Cost Core · S&P 5000.03%1.11%+10.9%+13.0%+21.5%+11.7%−8.9%13.8%$875B1.3

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilDefined Outcome · Buffer0.79%0.00%+10.4%+11.8%+12.2%+9.1%−3.8%5.7%$201M1.8

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: NAPR 2020 · IVV 2000

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · $201M$15,448

NAPR

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF · $875B$17,414

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

NAPRMeasureIVV

+10.4%

More Ways to See the Pairs

NAPR vs IVV: Top 5 Holdings

Today

NAPR

[…]in top 5

IVV

in top 527.3%

NAPRStockIVV

not top 5AAPL7.9%

not top 5NVDA6.6%

not top 5MSFT6.2%

not top 5AMZN4.0%

not top 5GOOGL2.6%

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: NAPR, IVV

Today

0.03%lowest, IVV

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

IVV0.03%$3

NAPR0.79%$79

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: NAPR, IVV

1Y

1.11%highest, IVV

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+10.9%

SPYSPDR

+10.8%

+10.9%Year to date+10.8%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$179BAssets$778B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026

VOO vs IVV

YTD

VanguardVOO

+10.9%

IVViShares

+10.9%

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+33.8%

VIGVanguard

+15.1%

Year to date

Jan 1 → Nov 10

+10.9%

+11.8%1 yearTotal return+13.0%

+12.2%3 years · per year$10,000 became $14,117 · $17,934+21.5%

+9.1%5 years · per year$10,000 became $15,448 · $17,414+11.7%

0.79%Expense ratio$79 · $3 a year on $10k · lower is better0.03%

0.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$0 · $111 a year on $10k1.11%

−3.8%Worst dropSmaller is better−8.9%

5.7%VolatilityLower is calmer13.8%

NAPRIVV Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

2–6IVV wins

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · share of each fund

NAPR vs IVV Returns, Every Period

5Y

InnovatorNAPR

+9.1%

5 years, per year

IVViShares

+11.7%

5 years, per year

NAPRIVVFaded: behind in that period

0–4IVV wins

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

Defined Outcome vs Core: NAPR vs IVV

YTD

InnovatorNAPR

+10.4%

IVViShares

+10.9%

+10.4%Year to date+10.9%

−3.8%Worst drop · 1Y−8.9%

5.7%Volatility · 1Y13.8%

0.0%Yield1.1%

$201MAssets$875B

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

IVV1.11%$111

NAPR0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$108most kept, IVV

IVV$111 − $3 = $108

NAPR$0 − $79 = −$79

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: NAPR, IVV

Today

[…]holdings […]

NAPRIVV

NAPR—[…]

IVV[…]—

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

+13.0%IVV, at 13.8% volatility

NAPRWorst drop−3.8%5.7% vol

IVVWorst drop−8.9%13.8% vol

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

IVVNAPR

+10.9%Year to date+10.4%

1.1%Yield0.0%

+13.0%Past year+11.8%

0.03%Fee0.79%

4–0IVV wins

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026

Year to date

+10.9%

1.1%Yield1.1%

$1.00TAssets$875B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026

+33.8%Year to date+15.1%

2.9%Yield1.5%

$122BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 10, 2026

Loading…

NAPR and IVV

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two