Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

NAPR and VOO

NAPRInnovator×VOOVanguard×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

IWD−0.4%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$17,393VOO · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeVOO · 1.07% · $107 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

NAPR and VOO, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilDefined Outcome · Buffer0.79%0.00%+12.3%+14.1%+12.0%+9.3%−3.8%5.8%$205M1.5

Vanguard S&P 500 ETFLow-Cost Core · S&P 5000.03%1.07%+11.9%+12.1%+21.7%+11.7%−8.9%13.7%$1.00T1.5

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: NAPR 2020 · VOO 2010

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · $205M$15,615

NAPR

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF · $1.00T$17,393

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

NAPRMeasureVOO

+12.3%

More Ways to See the Pairs

NAPR vs VOO: Top 5 Holdings

Today

NAPR

[…]in top 5

VOO

in top 528.3%

NAPRStockVOO

not top 5NVDA8.4%

not top 5AAPL7.4%

not top 5MSFT5.8%

not top 5AMZN3.7%

not top 5GOOGL3.1%

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: NAPR, VOO

Today

0.03%lowest, VOO

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

VOO0.03%$3

NAPR0.79%$79

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: NAPR, VOO

1Y

1.07%highest, VOO

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+12.0%

SPYSPDR

+11.9%

+12.0%Year to date+11.9%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$186BAssets$806B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

VOO vs IVV

YTD

VanguardVOO

+11.9%

IVViShares

+12.0%

+11.9%

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.2%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 12

+11.9%

+14.1%1 yearTotal return+12.1%

+12.0%3 years · per year$10,000 became $14,063 · $18,015+21.7%

+9.3%5 years · per year$10,000 became $15,615 · $17,393+11.7%

0.79%Expense ratio$79 · $3 a year on $10k · lower is better0.03%

0.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$0 · $107 a year on $10k1.07%

−3.8%Worst dropSmaller is better−8.9%

5.8%VolatilityLower is calmer13.7%

NAPRVOO Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

4–4Level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · share of each fund

NAPR vs VOO Returns, Every Period

5Y

InnovatorNAPR

+9.3%

5 years, per year

VOOVanguard

+11.7%

5 years, per year

NAPRVOOFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

Defined Outcome vs Core: NAPR vs VOO

YTD

InnovatorNAPR

+12.3%

VOOVanguard

+11.9%

+12.3%Year to date+11.9%

−3.8%Worst drop · 1Y−8.9%

5.8%Volatility · 1Y13.7%

0.0%Yield1.1%

$205MAssets$1.00T

3–1NAPR wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

VOO1.07%$107

NAPR0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

$104most kept, VOO

VOO$107 − $3 = $104

NAPR$0 − $79 = −$79

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: NAPR, VOO

Today

[…]holdings […]

NAPRVOO

NAPR—[…]

VOO[…]—

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

+14.1%NAPR, at 5.8% volatility

NAPRWorst drop−3.8%5.8% vol

VOOWorst drop−8.9%13.7% vol

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

VOONAPR

+11.9%Year to date+12.3%

1.1%Yield0.0%

+12.1%Past year+14.1%

0.03%Fee0.79%

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

Year to date

+12.0%

1.1%Yield1.1%

$1.00TAssets$879B

1–0IVV wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

+34.2%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$124BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 12, 2026

Loading…

NAPR and VOO

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two