Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

PGJ and CQQQ

PGJInvesco×CQQQInvesco×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$5,984CQQQ · best of the two

02 / 04

PGJ and CQQQ, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Invesco China Technology ETFThematic · China0.65%2.80%−22.5%−24.8%+6.2%−9.8%−35.8%30.7%$1.7B1.4

Invesco Golden Dragon China ETFThematic · China0.70%1.94%−22.1%−27.8%−0.6%−11.2%−33.2%23.2%$78M1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: PGJ 2004 · CQQQ 2009

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF · $78M$5,533

PGJ

CQQQ

Invesco China Technology ETF · $1.7B$5,984

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.4% in common

PGJMeasureCQQQ

−22.1%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 5−22.5%

−27.8%1 yearTotal return−24.8%

−0.6%3 years · per year$10,000 became $9,810 · $11,988+6.2%

−11.2%5 years · per year$10,000 became $5,533 · $5,984−9.8%

0.70%Expense ratio$70 · $65 a year on $10k · lower is better0.65%

1.94%Trailing 12-mo yield$194 · $280 a year on $10k2.80%

−33.2%Worst dropSmaller is better−35.8%

23.2%VolatilityLower is calmer30.7%

PGJCQQQ Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–5CQQQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

PGJ vs CQQQ: Top 5 Holdings

Today

PGJ

37.9%in top 5

CQQQ

in top 545.6%

PGJStockCQQQ

not top 5PDD12.1%

not top 5MPNGF11.8%

not top 5TCTZF11.0%

9.4%YUMCnot top 5

8.3%JDnot top 5

7.8%BABAnot top 5

6.8%NTESnot top 5

not top 5BAIDF6.7%

5.5%BIDUnot top 5

not top 5KUASF4.0%

Held in common0.4%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share of each fund

PGJ vs CQQQ Returns, Every Period

InvescoPGJ

−11.2%

5 years, per year

CQQQInvesco

−9.8%

5 years, per year

PGJCQQQFaded: behind in that period

1–3CQQQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

PGJ vs CQQQ

YTD

InvescoPGJ

−22.1%

CQQQInvesco

−22.5%

−22.1%Year to date−22.5%

−33.2%Worst drop · 1Y−35.8%

23.2%Volatility · 1Y30.7%

1.9%Yield2.8%

$77.9MAssets$1.7B

3–1PGJ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: PGJ, CQQQ

Today

0.65%lowest, CQQQ

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

CQQQ0.65%$65

PGJ0.70%$70

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: PGJ, CQQQ

2.80%highest, CQQQ

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

CQQQ2.80%$280

PGJ1.94%$194

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$215most kept, CQQQ

CQQQ$280 − $65 = $215

PGJ$194 − $70 = $124

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: PGJ, CQQQ

Today

0.4%most shared, PGJ and CQQQ

PGJCQQQ

PGJ—0.4%

CQQQ0.4%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

−24.8%CQQQ, at 30.7% volatility

PGJWorst drop−33.2%23.2% vol

CQQQWorst drop−35.8%30.7% vol

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

CQQQPGJ

−22.5%Year to date−22.1%

2.8%Yield1.9%

−24.8%Past year−27.8%

0.65%Fee0.70%

3–1CQQQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.1BAssets$46.1B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.4%

SPYSPDR

+8.3%

+8.4%Year to date+8.3%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$805B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026