Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QFRD and MTUM

QFRDPacer×MTUMiShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$13,927MTUM · best of the two

02 / 03

QFRD and MTUM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFUS Stock Styles · Factor0.15%2.96%+0.4%+1.1%+23.1%+6.8%−27.3%29.2%$17.0B1.0

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETFUS Stock Styles · Factor0.49%0.13%[…][…][…][…][…][…]$2M2.0

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QFRD 2026 · MTUM 2013

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF · $2M[…]

QFRD

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · $17.0B$13,927

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 16.1% in common

QFRDMeasureMTUM

[…]Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 5+0.4%

[…]1 yearTotal return+1.1%

[…]3 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $18,653+23.1%

[…]5 years · per year$10,000 became […] · $13,927+6.8%

0.49%Expense ratio$49 · $15 a year on $10k · lower is better0.15%

0.13%Trailing 12-mo yield$13 · $296 a year on $10k2.96%

[…]Worst dropSmaller is better−27.3%

[…]VolatilityLower is calmer29.2%

QFRDMTUM Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

0–2MTUM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

QFRD vs MTUM: Top 5 Holdings

Today

QFRD

18.1%in top 5

MTUM

in top 521.2%

QFRDStockMTUM

not top 5AMD5.8%

not top 5MU4.7%

3.9%REGNnot top 5

not top 5JNJ3.9%

3.7%INCYnot top 5

not top 5CSCO3.7%

3.7%WDAYnot top 5

3.5%VRTXnot top 5

3.2%CDNSnot top 5

not top 5XOM3.1%

Held in common16.1%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share of each fund

QFRD vs MTUM Returns, Every Period

PacerQFRD

[…]

past year

MTUMiShares

+1.1%

past year

Returns […]

QFRDMTUMFaded: behind in that period

0–0Level

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

QFRD vs MTUM

YTD

PacerQFRD

[…]

MTUMiShares

+0.4%

[…]Year to date+0.4%

[…]Worst drop · 1Y−27.3%

[…]Volatility · 1Y29.2%

0.1%Yield3.0%

$1.8MAssets$17.0B

1–0MTUM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QFRD, MTUM

Today

0.15%lowest, MTUM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

MTUM0.15%$15

QFRD0.49%$49

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QFRD, MTUM

2.96%highest, MTUM

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

MTUM2.96%$296

QFRD0.13%$13

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$281most kept, MTUM

MTUM$296 − $15 = $281

QFRD$13 − $49 = −$36

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QFRD, MTUM

Today

16.1%most shared, QFRD and MTUM

QFRDMTUM

QFRD—16.1%

MTUM16.1%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+1.1%MTUM, at 29.2% volatility

MTUMWorst drop−27.3%29.2% vol

QFRDWorst drop[…][…]

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · up and left is better

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$123BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.1BAssets$46.1B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.4%

SPYSPDR

+8.3%

+8.4%Year to date+8.3%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$805B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026