Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QLD and LTL

QLDProShares×LTLProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,976LTL · best of the two

02 / 04

QLD and LTL, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.17%+5.4%+1.3%+36.7%+12.2%−28.3%42.6%$11.5B1.4

ProShares Ultra Communication ServicesLeveraged · 2x1.83%1.32%−25.3%−19.9%+27.2%+16.0%−33.9%33.7%$4M1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QLD 2006 · LTL 2008

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares Ultra Communication Services · $4M$20,976

LTL

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $11.5B$17,751

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 9.1% in common

LTLMeasureQLD

−25.3%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 6+5.4%

−19.9%1 yearTotal return+1.3%

+27.2%3 years · per year$10,000 became $20,587 · $25,564+36.7%

+16.0%5 years · per year$10,000 became $20,976 · $17,751+12.2%

1.83%Expense ratio$183 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

1.32%Trailing 12-mo yield$132 · $17 a year on $10k0.17%

−33.9%Worst dropSmaller is better−28.3%

33.7%VolatilityLower is calmer42.6%

LTLQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–5QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

LTL vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

LTL

29.3%in top 5

QLD

in top 534.2%

LTLStockQLD

not top 5IQMM13.0%

11.8%METAnot top 5

not top 5AAPL6.6%

6.1%GOOGLnot top 5

not top 5NVDA5.7%

not top 5MSFT5.2%

4.9%GOOGnot top 5

not top 5AMZN3.7%

3.3%APPnot top 5

3.2%DISnot top 5

Held in common9.1%

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share of each fund

LTL vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesLTL

+16.0%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+12.2%

5 years, per year

LTLQLDFaded: behind in that period

1–3QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

LTL vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesLTL

−25.3%

QLDProShares

+5.4%

−25.3%Year to date+5.4%

−33.9%Worst drop · 1Y−28.3%

33.7%Volatility · 1Y42.6%

1.3%Yield0.2%

$4.0MAssets$11.5B

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QLD, LTL

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

LTL1.83%$183

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QLD, LTL

1.32%highest, LTL

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LTL1.32%$132

QLD0.17%$17

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$51most kept, LTL

LTL$132 − $183 = −$51

QLD$17 − $96 = −$79

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QLD, LTL

Today

9.1%most shared, QLD and LTL

QLDLTL

QLD—9.1%

LTL9.1%—

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+1.3%QLD, at 42.6% volatility

LTLWorst drop−33.9%33.7% vol

QLDWorst drop−28.3%42.6% vol

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LTLQLD

−25.3%Year to date+5.4%

1.3%Yield0.2%

−19.9%Past year+1.3%

1.83%Fee0.96%

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+31.4%

VIGVanguard

+12.1%

+31.4%Year to date+12.1%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+3.2%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.3%

+3.2%Year to date+5.3%

12.8%Yield8.1%

$40.7BAssets$45.2B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.8%

SPYSPDR

+8.7%

+8.8%Year to date+8.7%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$178BAssets$778B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026