Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QLD and ROM

QLDProShares×ROMProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$22,935ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

QLD and ROM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.03%+35.4%+22.3%+50.6%+18.1%−31.3%54.8%$1.1B1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+15.6%+8.9%+44.1%+15.1%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QLD 2006 · ROM 2007

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,204

QLD

ROM

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $1.1B$22,935

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 42.0% in common

QLDMeasureROM

+15.6%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+35.4%

+8.9%1 yearTotal return+22.3%

+44.1%3 years · per year$10,000 became $29,937 · $34,190+50.6%

+15.1%5 years · per year$10,000 became $20,204 · $22,935+18.1%

0.96%Expense ratio$96 · $93 a year on $10k · lower is better0.93%

0.15%Trailing 12-mo yield$15 · $3 a year on $10k0.03%

−24.1%Worst dropSmaller is better−31.3%

40.5%VolatilityLower is calmer54.8%

QLDROM Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–5ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

QLD vs ROM: Top 5 Holdings

Today

QLD

30.7%in top 5

ROM

in top 533.9%

QLDStockROM

11.1%IQMM3.4%

5.9%AAPL10.0%

5.9%NVDA9.9%

4.5%MSFT7.6%

3.2%AMZNnot top 5

not top 5AVGO3.1%

Held in common42.0%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

QLD vs ROM Returns, Every Period

ProSharesQLD

+15.1%

5 years, per year

ROMProShares

+18.1%

5 years, per year

QLDROMFaded: behind in that period

0–4ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

QLD vs ROM

YTD

ProSharesQLD

+15.6%

ROMProShares

+35.4%

+15.6%Year to date+35.4%

−24.1%Worst drop · 1Y−31.3%

40.5%Volatility · 1Y54.8%

0.2%Yield0.0%

$13.2BAssets$1.1B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QLD, ROM

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

QLD0.96%$96

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QLD, ROM

0.15%highest, QLD

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QLD0.15%$15

ROM0.03%$3

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$81most kept, QLD

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

ROM$3 − $93 = −$90

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QLD, ROM

Today

42.0%most shared, QLD and ROM

QLDROM

QLD—42.0%

ROM42.0%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+22.3%ROM, at 54.8% volatility

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

ROMWorst drop−31.3%54.8% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QLDROM

+15.6%Year to date+35.4%

0.2%Yield0.0%

+8.9%Past year+22.3%

0.96%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026