Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QLD and ROM

QLDProShares×ROMProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$18,868ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

QLD and ROM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.04%+16.8%+9.7%+39.9%+13.5%−37.3%57.3%$962M1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.17%+5.4%+1.3%+36.7%+12.2%−28.3%42.6%$11.5B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QLD 2006 · ROM 2007

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $962M$18,868

ROM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $11.5B$17,751

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 42.8% in common

ROMMeasureQLD

+16.8%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 6+5.4%

+9.7%1 yearTotal return+1.3%

+39.9%3 years · per year$10,000 became $27,382 · $25,564+36.7%

+13.5%5 years · per year$10,000 became $18,868 · $17,751+12.2%

0.93%Expense ratio$93 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.04%Trailing 12-mo yield$4 · $17 a year on $10k0.17%

−37.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−28.3%

57.3%VolatilityLower is calmer42.6%

ROMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

ROM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

ROM

38.7%in top 5

QLD

in top 534.2%

ROMStockQLD

4.0%IQMM13.0%

11.8%AAPL6.6%

10.3%NVDA5.7%

9.3%MSFT5.2%

not top 5AMZN3.7%

3.3%AVGOnot top 5

Held in common42.8%

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share of each fund

ROM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesROM

+13.5%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+12.2%

5 years, per year

ROMQLDFaded: behind in that period

4–0ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

ROM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesROM

+16.8%

QLDProShares

+5.4%

+16.8%Year to date+5.4%

−37.3%Worst drop · 1Y−28.3%

57.3%Volatility · 1Y42.6%

0.0%Yield0.2%

$962MAssets$11.5B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QLD, ROM

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

QLD0.96%$96

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QLD, ROM

0.17%highest, QLD

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QLD0.17%$17

ROM0.04%$4

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$79most kept, QLD

QLD$17 − $96 = −$79

ROM$4 − $93 = −$89

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QLD, ROM

Today

42.8%most shared, QLD and ROM

QLDROM

QLD—42.8%

ROM42.8%—

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+9.7%ROM, at 57.3% volatility

QLDWorst drop−28.3%42.6% vol

ROMWorst drop−37.3%57.3% vol

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QLDROM

+5.4%Year to date+16.8%

0.2%Yield0.0%

+1.3%Past year+9.7%

0.96%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+31.4%

VIGVanguard

+12.1%

+31.4%Year to date+12.1%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+3.2%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.3%

+3.2%Year to date+5.3%

12.8%Yield8.1%

$40.7BAssets$45.2B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.8%

SPYSPDR

+8.7%

+8.8%Year to date+8.7%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$178BAssets$778B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 6, 2026