Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QLD and UWM

QLDProShares×UWMProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$17,482QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

QLD and UWM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000Leveraged · 2x1.08%0.92%+14.1%+18.0%+28.3%−1.2%−22.3%37.1%$206M1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.17%+2.8%+0.1%+37.1%+11.8%−28.3%42.6%$11.1B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QLD 2006 · UWM 2007

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000 · $206M$9,428

UWM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $11.1B$17,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 11.4% in common

UWMMeasureQLD

+14.1%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 5+2.8%

+18.0%1 yearTotal return+0.1%

+28.3%3 years · per year$10,000 became $21,128 · $25,792+37.1%

−1.2%5 years · per year$10,000 became $9,428 · $17,482+11.8%

1.08%Expense ratio$108 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.92%Trailing 12-mo yield$92 · $17 a year on $10k0.17%

−22.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−28.3%

37.1%VolatilityLower is calmer42.6%

UWMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

UWM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

UWM

36.0%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

UWMStockQLD

35.4%IQMM11.4%

not top 5AAPL5.8%

not top 5NVDA5.5%

not top 5MSFT4.7%

not top 5AMZN3.3%

0.2%GKOSnot top 5

0.2%BTSGnot top 5

0.1%UMBFnot top 5

0.1%EATnot top 5

Held in common11.4%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share of each fund

UWM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesUWM

−1.2%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+11.8%

5 years, per year

UWMQLDFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

UWM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesUWM

+14.1%

QLDProShares

+2.8%

+14.1%Year to date+2.8%

−22.3%Worst drop · 1Y−28.3%

37.1%Volatility · 1Y42.6%

0.9%Yield0.2%

$206MAssets$11.1B

4–0UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QLD, UWM

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

UWM1.08%$108

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QLD, UWM

0.92%highest, UWM

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

UWM0.92%$92

QLD0.17%$17

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$16most kept, UWM

UWM$92 − $108 = −$16

QLD$17 − $96 = −$79

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QLD, UWM

Today

11.4%most shared, QLD and UWM

QLDUWM

QLD—11.4%

UWM11.4%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+18.0%UWM, at 37.1% volatility

UWMWorst drop−22.3%37.1% vol

QLDWorst drop−28.3%42.6% vol

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

UWMQLD

+14.1%Year to date+2.8%

0.9%Yield0.2%

+18.0%Past year+0.1%

1.08%Fee0.96%

3–1UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.6BAssets$46.8B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+8.4%

SPYSPDR

+8.3%

+8.4%Year to date+8.3%

1.1%Yield1.0%

$182BAssets$819B

2–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026