Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

QTUM and SMH

QTUMDefiance×SMHVanEck×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$38,820SMH · best of the two

02 / 04

QTUM and SMH, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

VanEck Semiconductor ETFThematic · AI & semis0.35%0.22%+40.0%+38.2%+54.7%+31.2%−24.6%41.2%$65.8B1.4

Defiance Quantum ETFThematic · Quantum0.40%1.07%+19.8%+15.8%+44.2%+21.3%−22.3%33.3%$4.9B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: QTUM 2018 · SMH 2011

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Defiance Quantum ETF · $4.9B$26,268

QTUM

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF · $65.8B$38,820

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 25.1% in common

QTUMMeasureSMH

+19.8%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+40.0%

+15.8%1 yearTotal return+38.2%

+44.2%3 years · per year$10,000 became $29,963 · $37,049+54.7%

+21.3%5 years · per year$10,000 became $26,268 · $38,820+31.2%

0.40%Expense ratio$40 · $35 a year on $10k · lower is better0.35%

1.07%Trailing 12-mo yield$108 · $22 a year on $10k0.22%

−22.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.6%

33.3%VolatilityLower is calmer41.2%

QTUMSMH Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–5SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

QTUM vs SMH: Top 5 Holdings

Today

QTUM

9.5%in top 5

SMH

in top 547.1%

QTUMStockSMH

not top 5NVDA20.6%

not top 5TSM9.6%

not top 5TXN6.0%

not top 5AVGO5.8%

not top 5AMD5.2%

2.2%3443.TWnot top 5

2.0%ESTCnot top 5

1.8%PLTRnot top 5

1.8%HQnot top 5

1.7%MSFTnot top 5

Held in common25.1%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

QTUM vs SMH Returns, Every Period

DefianceQTUM

+21.3%

5 years, per year

SMHVanEck

+31.2%

5 years, per year

QTUMSMHFaded: behind in that period

0–4SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

QTUM vs SMH

YTD

DefianceQTUM

+19.8%

SMHVanEck

+40.0%

+19.8%Year to date+40.0%

−22.3%Worst drop · 1Y−24.6%

33.3%Volatility · 1Y41.2%

1.1%Yield0.2%

$4.9BAssets$65.8B

3–1QTUM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: QTUM, SMH

Today

0.35%lowest, SMH

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

SMH0.35%$35

QTUM0.40%$40

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: QTUM, SMH

1.07%highest, QTUM

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QTUM1.07%$108

SMH0.22%$22

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$68most kept, QTUM

QTUM$108 − $40 = $68

SMH$22 − $35 = −$13

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: QTUM, SMH

Today

25.1%most shared, QTUM and SMH

QTUMSMH

QTUM—25.1%

SMH25.1%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+38.2%SMH, at 41.2% volatility

QTUMWorst drop−22.3%33.3% vol

SMHWorst drop−24.6%41.2% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QTUMSMH

+19.8%Year to date+40.0%

1.1%Yield0.2%

+15.8%Past year+38.2%

0.40%Fee0.35%

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SOXX vs SMH

YTD

iSharesSOXX

+49.8%

SMHVanEck

+40.0%

+49.8%Year to date+40.0%

0.33% · $33Fee · on $10k a year0.35% · $35

$44.3BAssets$65.8B

2–0SOXX wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026