Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

RECS and IWF

RECSColumbia Threadneedle×IWFiShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$18,659RECS · best of the two

02 / 04

RECS and IWF, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETFUnsorted0.15%1.00%+11.4%+12.2%+24.3%+13.3%−8.8%12.0%$6.1B1.0

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFUS Stock Styles · Growth0.18%0.37%−0.1%−3.0%+22.3%+10.6%−15.6%18.3%$120B2.0

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: RECS 2019 · IWF 2000

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF · $6.1B$18,659

RECS

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · $120B$16,559

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 37.6% in common

RECSMeasureIWF

+11.4%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4−0.1%

+12.2%1 yearTotal return−3.0%

+24.3%3 years · per year$10,000 became $19,202 · $18,310+22.3%

+13.3%5 years · per year$10,000 became $18,659 · $16,559+10.6%

0.15%Expense ratio$15 · $18 a year on $10k · lower is better0.18%

1.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$100 · $37 a year on $10k0.37%

−8.8%Worst dropSmaller is better−15.6%

12.0%VolatilityLower is calmer18.3%

RECSIWF Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

8–0RECS wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

RECS vs IWF: Top 5 Holdings

Today

RECS

33.0%in top 5

IWF

in top 539.3%

RECSStockIWF

11.5%NVDA15.1%

12.0%AAPL8.1%

not top 5MSFT6.1%

not top 5GOOGL5.1%

not top 5AVGO4.8%

4.2%METAnot top 5

2.7%MAnot top 5

2.7%XLCnot top 5

Held in common37.6%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

RECS vs IWF Returns, Every Period

Columbia ThreadneedleRECS

+13.3%

5 years, per year

IWFiShares

+10.6%

5 years, per year

RECSIWFFaded: behind in that period

4–0RECS wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

Unsorted vs Stocks: RECS vs IWF

YTD

Columbia ThreadneedleRECS

+11.4%

IWFiShares

−0.1%

+11.4%Year to date−0.1%

−8.8%Worst drop · 1Y−15.6%

12.0%Volatility · 1Y18.3%

1.0%Yield0.4%

$6.1BAssets$120B

4–0RECS wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: RECS, IWF

Today

0.15%lowest, RECS

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

RECS0.15%$15

IWF0.18%$18

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: RECS, IWF

1.00%highest, RECS

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

RECS1.00%$100

IWF0.37%$37

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$85most kept, RECS

RECS$100 − $15 = $85

IWF$37 − $18 = $19

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: RECS, IWF

Today

37.6%most shared, RECS and IWF

RECSIWF

RECS—37.6%

IWF37.6%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+12.2%RECS, at 12.0% volatility

RECSWorst drop−8.8%12.0% vol

IWFWorst drop−15.6%18.3% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

RECSIWF

+11.4%Year to date−0.1%

1.0%Yield0.4%

+12.2%Past year−3.0%

0.15%Fee0.18%

4–0RECS wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

VUG vs SCHG

YTD

VanguardVUG

+6.3%

SCHGSchwab

+6.8%

+6.3%Year to date+6.8%

0.03% · $3Fee · on $10k a year0.04% · $4

$233BAssets$61.1B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026