Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

ROM and QLD

ROMProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$22,935ROM · best of the two

02 / 04

ROM and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra TechnologyLeveraged · 2x0.93%0.03%+35.4%+22.3%+50.6%+18.1%−31.3%54.8%$1.1B1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+15.6%+8.9%+44.1%+15.1%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: ROM 2007 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Technology · $1.1B$22,935

ROM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,204

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 42.0% in common

ROMMeasureQLD

+35.4%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+15.6%

+22.3%1 yearTotal return+8.9%

+50.6%3 years · per year$10,000 became $34,190 · $29,937+44.1%

+18.1%5 years · per year$10,000 became $22,935 · $20,204+15.1%

0.93%Expense ratio$93 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.03%Trailing 12-mo yield$3 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−31.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

54.8%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

ROMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

ROM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

ROM

33.9%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

ROMStockQLD

3.4%IQMM11.1%

10.0%AAPL5.9%

9.9%NVDA5.9%

7.6%MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

3.1%AVGOnot top 5

Held in common42.0%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

ROM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesROM

+18.1%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.1%

5 years, per year

ROMQLDFaded: behind in that period

4–0ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

ROM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesROM

+35.4%

QLDProShares

+15.6%

+35.4%Year to date+15.6%

−31.3%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

54.8%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

0.0%Yield0.2%

$1.1BAssets$13.2B

3–1QLD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: ROM, QLD

Today

0.93%lowest, ROM

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

ROM0.93%$93

QLD0.96%$96

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: ROM, QLD

0.15%highest, QLD

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

QLD0.15%$15

ROM0.03%$3

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$81most kept, QLD

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

ROM$3 − $93 = −$90

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: ROM, QLD

Today

42.0%most shared, ROM and QLD

ROMQLD

ROM—42.0%

QLD42.0%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+22.3%ROM, at 54.8% volatility

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

ROMWorst drop−31.3%54.8% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

QLDROM

+15.6%Year to date+35.4%

0.2%Yield0.0%

+8.9%Past year+22.3%

0.96%Fee0.93%

3–1ROM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026