Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

SIVR and PLTM

SIVRAberdeen×PLTMGraniteShares×

Versus in desk

02 / 04

−0.1%

IWD+0.2%

Search ETFs and stocks

Portfolio

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$19,940SIVR · best of the two

Story of the two · IncomeMost incomeSIVR · 0.00% · $0 a year on $10k

Story of the two · RiskSmallest drop

SIVR and PLTM, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

GraniteShares Platinum TrustCommodities · Silver & metals0.50%0.00%−27.6%−8.3%+19.0%+7.0%−49.1%52.6%$154M1.4

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFCommodities · Silver & metals0.30%0.00%−31.4%−8.5%+29.0%+14.8%−58.1%65.9%$3.5B1.5

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: SIVR 2009 · PLTM 2018

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

5Y

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · $3.5B$19,940

SIVR

PLTM

GraniteShares Platinum Trust · $154M$14,055

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

SIVRMeasurePLTM

−31.4%

More Ways to See the Pairs

SIVR vs PLTM: Top 5 Holdings

Today

SIVR

[…]in top 5

PLTM

in top 5[…]

Holdings […] not in today’s data

Held in common[…]

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share of each fund

SIVR vs PLTM Returns, Every Period

5Y

AberdeenSIVR

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: SIVR, PLTM

Today

0.30%lowest, SIVR

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

SIVR0.30%$30

PLTM0.50%$50

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: SIVR, PLTM

1Y

0.00%highest, SIVR

FundTrailing yieldYield

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+34.9%

VIGVanguard

+16.0%

+34.9%Year to date+16.0%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$124BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+6.7%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.2%

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

Year to date

Jan 1 → Nov 13

−27.6%

−8.5%1 yearTotal return−8.3%

+29.0%3 years · per year$10,000 became $21,491 · $16,840+19.0%

+14.8%5 years · per year$10,000 became $19,940 · $14,055+7.0%

0.30%Expense ratio$30 · $50 a year on $10k · lower is better0.50%

0.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$0 · $0 a year on $10k0.00%

−58.1%Worst dropSmaller is better−49.1%

65.9%VolatilityLower is calmer52.6%

SIVRPLTM Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

3–4PLTM wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

+14.8%

5 years, per year

PLTMGraniteShares

+7.0%

5 years, per year

SIVRPLTMFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

SIVR vs PLTM

YTD

AberdeenSIVR

−31.4%

PLTMGraniteShares

−27.6%

−31.4%Year to date−27.6%

−58.1%Worst drop · 1Y−49.1%

65.9%Volatility · 1Y52.6%

0.0%Yield0.0%

$3.5BAssets$154M

3–0PLTM wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

$10k

SIVR0.00%$0

PLTM0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

1Y

−$30most kept, SIVR

SIVR$0 − $30 = −$30

PLTM$0 − $50 = −$50

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: SIVR, PLTM

Today

[…]holdings […]

SIVRPLTM

SIVR—[…]

PLTM[…]—

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

1Y

−8.3%PLTM, at 52.6% volatility

PLTMWorst drop−49.1%52.6% vol

SIVRWorst drop−58.1%65.9% vol

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

SIVRPLTM

−31.4%Year to date−27.6%

0.0%Yield0.0%

−8.5%Past year−8.3%

0.30%Fee0.50%

2–1PLTM wins

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

+6.7%Year to date+8.2%

12.4%Yield7.9%

$42.5BAssets$47.1B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Year to date

+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$186BAssets$807B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 13, 2026

Loading…

SIVR and PLTM

Head to Head

More Ways to See the Pairs

Cost, Income and Risk

Popular Pairs Near These Two