Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

TAN and LIT

TANInvesco×LITGlobal X×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$6,921LIT · best of the two

02 / 04

TAN and LIT, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.75%0.84%−7.0%−2.9%+8.5%−7.1%−34.4%30.4%$1.1B1.1

Invesco Solar ETFThematic · Clean energy & EV0.70%0.00%−11.8%−11.8%+2.1%−13.4%−45.6%38.3%$908M1.9

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: TAN 2008 · LIT 2010

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Invesco Solar ETF · $908M$4,860

TAN

LIT

Global X - Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · $1.1B$6,921

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

TANMeasureLIT

−11.8%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3−7.0%

−11.8%1 yearTotal return−2.9%

+2.1%3 years · per year$10,000 became $10,646 · $12,787+8.5%

−13.4%5 years · per year$10,000 became $4,860 · $6,921−7.1%

0.70%Expense ratio$70 · $75 a year on $10k · lower is better0.75%

0.00%Trailing 12-mo yield$0 · $84 a year on $10k0.84%

−45.6%Worst dropSmaller is better−34.4%

38.3%VolatilityLower is calmer30.4%

TANLIT Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

1–7LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

TAN vs LIT: Top 5 Holdings

Today

TAN

41.8%in top 5

LIT

in top 538.5%

TANStockLIT

not top 5RIO19.6%

12.3%NXTnot top 5

9.8%FSLRnot top 5

8.0%ENLT.TAnot top 5

6.3%ENPHnot top 5

5.4%HASInot top 5

not top 5ALB5.3%

not top 5TSLA4.9%

not top 5006400.K4.4%

not top 5300014.S4.3%

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

TAN vs LIT Returns, Every Period

InvescoTAN

−13.4%

5 years, per year

LITGlobal X

−7.1%

5 years, per year

TANLITFaded: behind in that period

0–4LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

TAN vs LIT

YTD

InvescoTAN

−11.8%

LITGlobal X

−7.0%

−11.8%Year to date−7.0%

−45.6%Worst drop · 1Y−34.4%

38.3%Volatility · 1Y30.4%

0.0%Yield0.8%

$908MAssets$1.1B

4–0LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: TAN, LIT

Today

0.70%lowest, TAN

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

TAN0.70%$70

LIT0.75%$75

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: TAN, LIT

0.84%highest, LIT

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

LIT0.84%$84

TAN0.00%$0

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$9most kept, LIT

LIT$84 − $75 = $9

TAN$0 − $70 = −$70

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: TAN, LIT

Today

0.0%most shared, TAN and LIT

TANLIT

TAN—0.0%

LIT0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

−2.9%LIT, at 30.4% volatility

LITWorst drop−34.4%30.4% vol

TANWorst drop−45.6%38.3% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

LITTAN

−7.0%Year to date−11.8%

0.8%Yield0.0%

−2.9%Past year−11.8%

0.75%Fee0.70%

3–1LIT wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026