Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

URA and SMH

URAGlobal X×SMHVanEck×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$38,820SMH · best of the two

02 / 04

URA and SMH, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

VanEck Semiconductor ETFThematic · AI & semis0.35%0.22%+40.0%+38.2%+54.7%+31.2%−24.6%41.2%$65.8B1.1

Global X - Uranium ETFThematic · Nuclear & uranium0.69%6.37%−23.5%−34.8%+13.2%+7.8%−47.1%50.6%$4.6B1.9

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: URA 2010 · SMH 2011

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Global X - Uranium ETF · $4.6B$14,540

URA

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF · $65.8B$38,820

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

URAMeasureSMH

−23.5%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+40.0%

−34.8%1 yearTotal return+38.2%

+13.2%3 years · per year$10,000 became $14,501 · $37,049+54.7%

+7.8%5 years · per year$10,000 became $14,540 · $38,820+31.2%

0.69%Expense ratio$69 · $35 a year on $10k · lower is better0.35%

6.37%Trailing 12-mo yield$637 · $22 a year on $10k0.22%

−47.1%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.6%

50.6%VolatilityLower is calmer41.2%

URASMH Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

1–7SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

URA vs SMH: Top 5 Holdings

Today

URA

46.7%in top 5

SMH

in top 547.1%

URAStockSMH

22.3%CCO.TOnot top 5

not top 5NVDA20.6%

not top 5TSM9.6%

8.5%U-U.TOnot top 5

6.3%NXE.TOnot top 5

not top 5TXN6.0%

not top 5AVGO5.8%

not top 5AMD5.2%

5.1%KAP.ILnot top 5

4.5%UECnot top 5

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

URA vs SMH Returns, Every Period

Global XURA

+7.8%

5 years, per year

SMHVanEck

+31.2%

5 years, per year

URASMHFaded: behind in that period

0–4SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

URA vs SMH

YTD

Global XURA

−23.5%

SMHVanEck

+40.0%

−23.5%Year to date+40.0%

−47.1%Worst drop · 1Y−24.6%

50.6%Volatility · 1Y41.2%

6.4%Yield0.2%

$4.6BAssets$65.8B

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: URA, SMH

Today

0.35%lowest, SMH

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

SMH0.35%$35

URA0.69%$69

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: URA, SMH

6.37%highest, URA

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

URA6.37%$637

SMH0.22%$22

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$568most kept, URA

URA$637 − $69 = $568

SMH$22 − $35 = −$13

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: URA, SMH

Today

0.0%most shared, URA and SMH

URASMH

URA—0.0%

SMH0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+38.2%SMH, at 41.2% volatility

SMHWorst drop−24.6%41.2% vol

URAWorst drop−47.1%50.6% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

URASMH

−23.5%Year to date+40.0%

6.4%Yield0.2%

−34.8%Past year+38.2%

0.69%Fee0.35%

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SOXX vs SMH

YTD

iSharesSOXX

+49.8%

SMHVanEck

+40.0%

+49.8%Year to date+40.0%

0.33% · $33Fee · on $10k a year0.35% · $35

$44.3BAssets$65.8B

2–0SOXX wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026