Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

URA and SMH

URAGlobal X×SMHVanEck×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$33,824SMH · best of the two

02 / 04

URA and SMH, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

VanEck Semiconductor ETFThematic · AI & semis0.35%0.25%+24.3%+27.3%+48.4%+27.6%−33.1%42.8%$57.7B1.1

Global X - Uranium ETFThematic · Nuclear & uranium0.69%6.73%−27.5%−34.7%+9.6%+6.6%−49.9%50.6%$4.5B1.9

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: URA 2010 · SMH 2011

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

Global X - Uranium ETF · $4.5B$13,751

URA

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF · $57.7B$33,824

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.0% in common

URAMeasureSMH

−27.5%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 5+24.3%

−34.7%1 yearTotal return+27.3%

+9.6%3 years · per year$10,000 became $13,183 · $32,662+48.4%

+6.6%5 years · per year$10,000 became $13,751 · $33,824+27.6%

0.69%Expense ratio$69 · $35 a year on $10k · lower is better0.35%

6.73%Trailing 12-mo yield$673 · $25 a year on $10k0.25%

−49.9%Worst dropSmaller is better−33.1%

50.6%VolatilityLower is calmer42.8%

URASMH Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

1–7SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

URA vs SMH: Top 5 Holdings

Today

URA

46.7%in top 5

SMH

in top 547.4%

URAStockSMH

22.3%CCO.TOnot top 5

not top 5NVDA20.5%

not top 5TSM9.7%

8.6%U-U.TOnot top 5

6.4%NXE.TOnot top 5

not top 5TXN6.1%

not top 5AVGO5.8%

not top 5AMD5.4%

5.1%KAP.ILnot top 5

4.4%UECnot top 5

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share of each fund

URA vs SMH Returns, Every Period

Global XURA

+6.6%

5 years, per year

SMHVanEck

+27.6%

5 years, per year

URASMHFaded: behind in that period

0–4SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

URA vs SMH

YTD

Global XURA

−27.5%

SMHVanEck

+24.3%

−27.5%Year to date+24.3%

−49.9%Worst drop · 1Y−33.1%

50.6%Volatility · 1Y42.8%

6.7%Yield0.2%

$4.5BAssets$57.7B

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: URA, SMH

Today

0.35%lowest, SMH

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

SMH0.35%$35

URA0.69%$69

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: URA, SMH

6.73%highest, URA

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

URA6.73%$673

SMH0.25%$25

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$604most kept, URA

URA$673 − $69 = $604

SMH$25 − $35 = −$10

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: URA, SMH

Today

0.0%most shared, URA and SMH

URASMH

URA—0.0%

SMH0.0%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+27.3%SMH, at 42.8% volatility

SMHWorst drop−33.1%42.8% vol

URAWorst drop−49.9%50.6% vol

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

URASMH

−27.5%Year to date+24.3%

6.7%Yield0.2%

−34.7%Past year+27.3%

0.69%Fee0.35%

3–1SMH wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SOXX vs SMH

YTD

iSharesSOXX

+31.6%

SMHVanEck

+24.3%

+31.6%Year to date+24.3%

0.33% · $33Fee · on $10k a year0.35% · $35

$37.6BAssets$57.7B

2–0SOXX wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.6BAssets$46.8B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026