Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

UWM and QLD

UWMProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,204QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

UWM and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000Leveraged · 2x1.08%0.86%+22.0%+20.8%+32.5%+0.2%−22.3%35.9%$216M1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+15.6%+8.9%+44.1%+15.1%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: UWM 2007 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000 · $216M$10,083

UWM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,204

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 11.1% in common

UWMMeasureQLD

+22.0%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 3+15.6%

+20.8%1 yearTotal return+8.9%

+32.5%3 years · per year$10,000 became $23,238 · $29,937+44.1%

+0.2%5 years · per year$10,000 became $10,083 · $20,204+15.1%

1.08%Expense ratio$108 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.86%Trailing 12-mo yield$86 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−22.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

35.9%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

UWMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

UWM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

UWM

37.8%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.7%

UWMStockQLD

37.2%IQMM11.1%

not top 5AAPL5.9%

not top 5NVDA5.9%

not top 5MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

0.2%GKOSnot top 5

0.2%BTSGnot top 5

0.1%UMBFnot top 5

0.1%VSATnot top 5

Held in common11.1%

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share of each fund

UWM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesUWM

+0.2%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.1%

5 years, per year

UWMQLDFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

UWM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesUWM

+22.0%

QLDProShares

+15.6%

+22.0%Year to date+15.6%

−22.3%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

35.9%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

0.9%Yield0.2%

$216MAssets$13.2B

4–0UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: UWM, QLD

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

UWM1.08%$108

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: UWM, QLD

0.86%highest, UWM

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

UWM0.86%$86

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$22most kept, UWM

UWM$86 − $108 = −$22

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: UWM, QLD

Today

11.1%most shared, UWM and QLD

UWMQLD

UWM—11.1%

QLD11.1%—

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+20.8%UWM, at 35.9% volatility

UWMWorst drop−22.3%35.9% vol

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

UWMQLD

+22.0%Year to date+15.6%

0.9%Yield0.2%

+20.8%Past year+8.9%

1.08%Fee0.96%

3–1UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.8%

VIGVanguard

+14.0%

+32.8%Year to date+14.0%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+7.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+7.0%

+7.5%Year to date+7.0%

12.3%Yield8.0%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+11.5%

SPYSPDR

+11.5%

+11.5%Year to date+11.5%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 3, 2026