Compare · 3 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

UWM, QLD and VOO

UWMProShares×QLDProShares×VOOVanguard×

Story of the three · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · all three on one scale$20,482QLD · best of the three

02 / 04

UWM, QLD and VOO, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

Vanguard S&P 500 ETFLow-Cost Core · S&P 5000.03%1.05%+13.4%+13.5%+24.2%+12.6%−8.9%12.8%$1.00T1.8

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000Leveraged · 2x1.08%0.84%+25.5%+25.4%+33.3%+1.5%−22.3%36.0%$216M2.0

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+17.8%+10.0%+44.0%+15.4%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B2.3

Rank among the three1st → 3rdFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: UWM 2007 · QLD 2006 · VOO 2010

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Russell2000 · $216M$10,796

UWM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 11.5% in common

UWMMeasureQLD

+25.5%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+17.8%

+25.4%1 yearTotal return+10.0%

+33.3%3 years · per year$10,000 became $23,668 · $29,852+44.0%

+1.5%5 years · per year$10,000 became $10,796 · $20,482+15.4%

1.08%Expense ratio$108 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

0.84%Trailing 12-mo yield$84 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−22.3%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

36.0%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

UWMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3UWM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

UWM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

UWM

36.7%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.6%

UWMStockQLD

36.0%IQMM11.5%

not top 5NVDA5.8%

not top 5AAPL5.6%

not top 5MSFT4.5%

not top 5AMZN3.2%

0.2%GKOSnot top 5

0.2%BTSGnot top 5

0.1%UMBFnot top 5

0.1%VSATnot top 5

Held in common11.5%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

UWM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesUWM

+1.5%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.4%

5 years, per year

UWMQLDFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

Leveraged vs Core: UWM vs VOO

YTD

ProSharesUWM

+25.5%

VOOVanguard

+13.4%

+25.5%Year to date+13.4%

−22.3%Worst drop · 1Y−8.9%

36.0%Volatility · 1Y12.8%

0.8%Yield1.1%

$216MAssets$1.00T

3–1VOO wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: UWM, QLD, VOO

Today

0.03%lowest, VOO

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

VOO0.03%$3

QLD0.96%$96

UWM1.08%$108

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: UWM, QLD, VOO

1.05%highest, VOO

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

VOO1.05%$105

UWM0.84%$84

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

$102most kept, VOO

VOO$105 − $3 = $102

UWM$84 − $108 = −$24

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: UWM, QLD, VOO

Today

47.0%most shared, QLD and VOO

UWMQLDVOO

UWM—11.5%0.0%

QLD11.5%—47.0%

VOO0.0%47.0%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 3 ETFs

+25.4%UWM, at 36.0% volatility

VOOWorst drop−8.9%12.8% vol

UWMWorst drop−22.3%36.0% vol

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

VOOUWM

+13.4%Year to date+25.5%

1.1%Yield0.8%

+13.5%Past year+25.4%

0.03%Fee1.08%

2–2level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Three

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

VOO vs IVV

YTD

VanguardVOO

+13.4%

IVViShares

+13.4%

+13.4%Year to date+13.4%

1.1%Yield1.1%

$1.00TAssets$872B

0–0level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026