Compare · 2 funds side by side · dividends reinvested

UYM and QLD

UYMProShares×QLDProShares×

Versus in desk

Story of the two · Growth5Y$10,000 five years agoDividends reinvested · both on one scale$20,482QLD · best of the two

02 / 04

UYM and QLD, Ranked

Today

FundFeeYieldYTD1 year3 yrs · yr5 yrs · yrWorst dropVolatilityAssetsAvg rank

ProShares - Ultra MaterialsLeveraged · 2x1.18%1.02%+34.1%+52.1%+19.8%+7.0%−23.9%36.0%$39M1.4

ProShares - Ultra QQQLeveraged · 2x0.96%0.15%+17.8%+10.0%+44.0%+15.4%−24.1%40.5%$13.2B1.6

Rank among the two1st → 2ndFee, drop and volatility: lower ranks higherAvg rank: mean of the 8 ranks · 1 is best

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · since: UYM 2007 · QLD 2006

Head to Head

Swap sides Versus in desk

Head to Head

ProShares - Ultra Materials · $39M$14,036

UYM

QLD

ProShares - Ultra QQQ · $13.2B$20,482

$10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested · they hold 0.8% in common

UYMMeasureQLD

+34.1%Year to dateJan 1 → Nov 4+17.8%

+52.1%1 yearTotal return+10.0%

+19.8%3 years · per year$10,000 became $17,196 · $29,852+44.0%

+7.0%5 years · per year$10,000 became $14,036 · $20,482+15.4%

1.18%Expense ratio$118 · $96 a year on $10k · lower is better0.96%

1.02%Trailing 12-mo yield$102 · $15 a year on $10k0.15%

−23.9%Worst dropSmaller is better−24.1%

36.0%VolatilityLower is calmer40.5%

UYMQLD Winner of the row, in its colourEach row: the bigger of the two fills its side

5–3UYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · returns include dividends · 3Y and 5Y figures are per-year returns

More Ways to See the Pairs

UYM vs QLD: Top 5 Holdings

Today

UYM

23.8%in top 5

QLD

in top 530.6%

UYMStockQLD

not top 5IQMM11.5%

8.9%LINnot top 5

not top 5NVDA5.8%

not top 5AAPL5.6%

not top 5MSFT4.5%

4.3%NEMnot top 5

3.6%VMCnot top 5

3.6%ECLnot top 5

3.4%MLMnot top 5

not top 5AMZN3.2%

Held in common0.8%

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share of each fund

UYM vs QLD Returns, Every Period

ProSharesUYM

+7.0%

5 years, per year

QLDProShares

+15.4%

5 years, per year

UYMQLDFaded: behind in that period

2–2Level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · dividends in · faded = behind in that period

UYM vs QLD

YTD

ProSharesUYM

+34.1%

QLDProShares

+17.8%

+34.1%Year to date+17.8%

−23.9%Worst drop · 1Y−24.1%

36.0%Volatility · 1Y40.5%

1.0%Yield0.1%

$39.3MAssets$13.2B

4–0UYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · smaller drop and lower volatility win

Cost, Income and Risk

Fees: UYM, QLD

Today

0.96%lowest, QLD

FundExpense ratioFee$10k

QLD0.96%$96

UYM1.18%$118

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · fee on $10,000 a year

Yields: UYM, QLD

1.02%highest, UYM

FundTrailing yieldYield$10k

UYM1.02%$102

QLD0.15%$15

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · trailing 12-month yield

Income After Fees on $10,000

−$16most kept, UYM

UYM$102 − $118 = −$16

QLD$15 − $96 = −$81

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee

Overlap: UYM, QLD

Today

0.8%most shared, UYM and QLD

UYMQLD

UYM—0.8%

QLD0.8%—

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Return vs Bumpiness: 2 ETFs

+52.1%UYM, at 36.0% volatility

UYMWorst drop−23.9%36.0% vol

QLDWorst drop−24.1%40.5% vol

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026 · up and left is better

Paid More vs Made More

YTD

UYMQLD

+34.1%Year to date+17.8%

1.0%Yield0.1%

+52.1%Past year+10.0%

1.18%Fee0.96%

3–1UYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

Popular Pairs Near These Two

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+35.3%

VIGVanguard

+16.4%

+35.3%Year to date+16.4%

2.9%Yield1.4%

$121BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+8.8%

+8.5%Year to date+8.8%

12.2%Yield7.8%

$41.8BAssets$46.0B

1–1level

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026

SPYM vs SPY

YTD

SPDRSPYM

+13.4%

SPYSPDR

+13.3%

+13.4%Year to date+13.3%

1.0%Yield1.0%

$185BAssets$798B

1–0SPYM wins

End-of-day Nov 4, 2026