MAGC vs PAVE

AMAGC

BPAVE

Measures won1–3PAVE wins · of 6 · 5Y

$10,000 · 5Y$19,922PAVE

Lowest cost0.47%PAVE · $47 on $10k

Most income5.53%MAGC · $553 on $10k

Smallest drop−15.3%PAVE · worst fall in 1Y

Held in common0.0%MAGC and PAVE

MAGC

PAVE

Roundhill Investments - China Magnificent Seven ETF · $13MGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · $13.5B

[…]3 years · per year[…] · $18,382+22.5%

[…]5 years · per year[…] · $19,922+14.8%

0.60%Expense ratio$60 · $47 on $10k · lower wins0.47%

5.53%12-mo yield$553 · $80 on $10k0.80%

−36.5%Worst drop

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · $10,000 5 years ago, dividends reinvested · ● winner of the row · each row scaled to the bigger of the two

Both

5Y2 funds

#			Trend
1	BPAVE	Global X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFRead Desk		0.47%	0.80%	+1.3%	+13.1%	+13.0%	+22.5%	+14.8%	−15.3%	$13.5B
2	AMAGC	Roundhill Investments - China Magnificent Seven ETFRead Desk		0.60%	5.53%	−2.6%	−25.8%	−31.7%	new	new	−36.5%	$13M

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · total return, dividends in · 3Y and 5Y per year · A and B = the pair in versus

Both

5Y2 funds

#			Trend
1	BPAVE	Global X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFRead Desk		0.47%	0.80%	+1.3%	+13.1%	+13.0%	+22.5%	+14.8%	−15.3%	$13.5B
2	AMAGC	Roundhill Investments - China Magnificent Seven ETFRead Desk		0.60%	5.53%	−2.6%	−25.8%	−31.7%	new	new	−36.5%	$13M

End-of-day Nov 11, 2026 · total return, dividends in · 3Y and 5Y per year · A and B = the pair in versus

Cards for this view

MAGC vs PAVE

MAGC

Roundhill Investments - China Magnificent Seven

[…]

PAVE

Global X - U.S. Infrastructure Development

$19,922

MeasureMAGCPAVE

Fee0.60%0.47%

Cost on $10k a year$60$47

Yield5.53%0.80%

5 years, per year[…]+14.8%

3 years, per year[…]+22.5%

Worst drop · 1Y−36.5%−15.3%

Volatility · 1Y27.8%

Loading…

MAGC vs PAVE

Both

Both

$10,000 in MAGC, PAVE

Overlap: MAGC, PAVE

MAGC vs PAVE

SCHD vs VIG

JEPQ vs JEPI

SPYM vs SPY

Overlap: MAGC, PAVE

Income After Fees on $10,000