MAGS vs LFSC

AMAGS

BLFSC

Measures won4–0MAGS wins · of 6 · 5Y

$10,000 · 5Y$33,824SMH · CIBR $17,492

Lowest cost0.30%MAGS · $30 on $10k

Most income1.46%MAGS · $146 on $10k

Smallest drop−17.5%MAGS · worst fall in 1Y

Held in common0.0%MAGS and LFSC

MAGS

LFSC

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF · $5.0BF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · $127M

+33.5%3 years · per year$23,790 · […][…]

[…]5 years · per year[…]

0.30%Expense ratio$30 · $79 on $10k · lower wins0.79%

1.46%12-mo yield$146 · $0 on $10k0.00%

−17.5%Worst dropSmaller wins−17.6%

22.6%VolatilityLower wins28.6%

4–0MAGS wins

$10,000 · 5 yearsAll four, one scale

Shared top holdingsMAGS · LFSC

They share no top holdings, or holdings aren’t on file […]

Held in common0.0%

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · $10,000 5 years ago, dividends reinvested · ● winner of the row · each row scaled to the bigger of the two

All Four

5Y4 funds

#
1	SMH	VanEck Semiconductor ETFRead Desk	0.35%	0.25%	−11.2%	+24.3%	+27.3%	+48.4%	+27.6%	−33.1%	$57.7B
2	CIBR	First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETFRead Desk	0.58%	0.43%	−6.5%	+27.7%	+21.3%	+27.4%	+11.8%	−20.6%	$16.9B
3	AMAGS	Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETFRead Desk	0.30%	1.46%	−4.9%	+1.3%	+1.1%	+33.5%	new	−17.5%	$5.0B
4	BLFSC	F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETFRead Desk	0.79%	0.00%	−5.3%	+18.1%	+36.0%	new	new	−17.6%	$127M

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · total return, dividends in · 3Y and 5Y per year · A and B = the pair in versus

All Four

5Y4 funds

#
1	SMH	VanEck Semiconductor ETFRead Desk	0.35%	0.25%	−11.2%	+24.3%	+27.3%	+48.4%	+27.6%	−33.1%	$57.7B
2	CIBR	First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETFRead Desk	0.58%	0.43%	−6.5%	+27.7%	+21.3%	+27.4%	+11.8%	−20.6%	$16.9B
3	AMAGS	Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETFRead Desk	0.30%	1.46%	−4.9%	+1.3%	+1.1%	+33.5%	new	−17.5%	$5.0B
4	BLFSC	F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETFRead Desk	0.79%	0.00%	−5.3%	+18.1%	+36.0%	new	new	−17.6%	$127M

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · total return, dividends in · 3Y and 5Y per year · A and B = the pair in versus

Cards for this view

MAGS vs LFSC

MAGS

Roundhill Magnificent Seven

[…]

LFSC

F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation

[…]

MeasureMAGSLFSC

Fee0.30%0.79%

Cost on $10k a year$30$79

Yield1.46%0.00%

5 years, per year[…][…]

3 years, per year+33.5%[…]

Worst drop · 1Y−17.5%−17.6%

Volatility · 1Y22.6%28.6%

4–0measures won
MAGS first

0.0%

holdings shared

Nov 5, 2026 · $10,000 five years ago, dividends reinvested

SOXX vs SMH

YTD

iSharesSOXX

+31.6%

SMHVanEck

+24.3%

+31.6%Year to date+24.3%

0.33% · $33Fee · on $10k a year0.35% · $35

$37.6BAssets$57.7B

2–0SOXX wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

SCHD vs VIG

YTD

SchwabSCHD

+32.3%

VIGVanguard

+12.5%

+32.3%Year to date+12.5%

3.0%Yield1.5%

$120BAssets$109B

2–0SCHD wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

JEPQ vs JEPI

YTD

J.P. MorganJEPQ

+8.5%

JEPIJ.P. Morgan

+5.2%

+8.5%Year to date+5.2%

12.2%Yield8.1%

$42.6BAssets$46.8B

2–0JEPQ wins

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026

Overlap: MAGS, LFSC, CIBR, SMH

Today

5.8%most shared, CIBR and SMH

MAGSLFSCCIBRSMH

MAGS—0.0%4.0%4.4%

LFSC0.0%—0.0%0.0%

CIBR4.0%0.0%—5.8%

SMH4.4%0.0%5.8%—

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · share held in common · outlined: the pair in versus

Income After Fees on $10,000

$116most kept, MAGS

MAGS$146 − $30 = $116

SMH$25 − $35 = −$10

CIBR$43 − $58 = −$15

LFSC$0 − $79 = −$79

KeptFee

End-of-day Nov 5, 2026 · yield in dollars minus the fee