Did it beat the Nasdaq?Would a plain Nasdaq fund have done better?

Full history: 2 of 9 themes beat the Nasdaq

← All 24 in Who's winning?
PreviewWide · 960 × 540 · Dark
9 flagship theme funds, four time spansFull history: 2 of 9 themes beat the Nasdaqvs QQQ · to Nov 2026As of Nov 4, 2026SMHAI & semissince 2011W+33.5W+30.0W+18.4W+8.84–0QTUMQuantumsince 2018W+6.6W+18.9W+8.3W+5.94–0CIBRCyber & cloudsince 2015W+16.8W+4.5W+0.2L−2.63–1ITADefensesince 2006L−8.9W+0.5W+3.7L−3.32–2PAVEInfrasince 2017W+5.1L−0.9W+2.7L−4.12–2IGVDisruptivesince 2006L−20.4L−10.7L−9.6L−2.60–4MCHIChinasince 2011L−30.1L−17.2L−17.2L−16.60–4ICLNClean energysince 2008L−15.2L−16.6L−20.2L−21.10–4URANuclearsince 2010L−46.3L−13.6L−4.4L−23.60–41 year4 of 9 won3 years4 of 9 won5 years5 of 9 wonFull history2 of 9 wonWins–lossesETFETF Tracker@TheETFTracker · theetftracker.comW or L and the margin in points a year, with payouts

W or L and the margin in points a year, with payouts

Other ways to see it

More in Beat the market

Also in Who's winning?

All 24 pictures →

Same picture, three shapes

Square and Tall for social feeds, Wide for posts and slides.

9 flagship theme funds, four time spansFull history: 2 of 9 themes beat the Nasdaqvs QQQ · to Nov 2026As of Nov 4, 20261 year4 of 9 won3 years4 of 9 won5 years5 of 9 wonFull history2 of 9 wonW–LTheme winsSMHAI & semis, since 2011W+33.5W+30.0W+18.4W+8.84–0QTUMQuantum, since 2018W+6.6W+18.9W+8.3W+5.94–0CIBRCyber & cloud, since 2015W+16.8W+4.5W+0.2L−2.63–1ITADefense & space, since 2006L−8.9W+0.5W+3.7L−3.32–2PAVEInfrastructure, since 2017W+5.1L−0.9W+2.7L−4.12–2IGVDisruptive tech, since 2006L−20.4L−10.7L−9.6L−2.60–4MCHIChina, since 2011L−30.1L−17.2L−17.2L−16.60–4ICLNClean energy, since 2008L−15.2L−16.6L−20.2L−21.10–4URANuclear, since 2010L−46.3L−13.6L−4.4L−23.60–4ETFETF Tracker@TheETFTracker · theetftracker.comW or L and the margin in points a year, with payoutsSquare720 × 7209 flagship theme funds, four time spansFull history: 2 of 9 themes beat the Nasdaqvs QQQ · to Nov 2026As of Nov 4, 20261 year4 of 9 won3 years4 of 9 won5 years5 of 9 wonFull history2 of 9 wonW–LTheme winsSMHAI & semis, since 2011W+33.5W+30.0W+18.4W+8.84–0QTUMQuantum, since 2018W+6.6W+18.9W+8.3W+5.94–0CIBRCyber & cloud, since 2015W+16.8W+4.5W+0.2L−2.63–1ITADefense & space, since 2006L−8.9W+0.5W+3.7L−3.32–2PAVEInfrastructure, since 2017W+5.1L−0.9W+2.7L−4.12–2IGVDisruptive tech, since 2006L−20.4L−10.7L−9.6L−2.60–4MCHIChina, since 2011L−30.1L−17.2L−17.2L−16.60–4ICLNClean energy, since 2008L−15.2L−16.6L−20.2L−21.10–4URANuclear, since 2010L−46.3L−13.6L−4.4L−23.60–4ETFETF Tracker@TheETFTracker · theetftracker.comW or L and the margin in points a year, with payoutsTall720 × 9009 flagship theme funds, four time spansFull history: 2 of 9 themes beat the Nasdaqvs QQQ · to Nov 2026As of Nov 4, 2026SMHAI & semissince 2011W+33.5W+30.0W+18.4W+8.84–0QTUMQuantumsince 2018W+6.6W+18.9W+8.3W+5.94–0CIBRCyber & cloudsince 2015W+16.8W+4.5W+0.2L−2.63–1ITADefensesince 2006L−8.9W+0.5W+3.7L−3.32–2PAVEInfrasince 2017W+5.1L−0.9W+2.7L−4.12–2IGVDisruptivesince 2006L−20.4L−10.7L−9.6L−2.60–4MCHIChinasince 2011L−30.1L−17.2L−17.2L−16.60–4ICLNClean energysince 2008L−15.2L−16.6L−20.2L−21.10–4URANuclearsince 2010L−46.3L−13.6L−4.4L−23.60–41 year4 of 9 won3 years4 of 9 won5 years5 of 9 wonFull history2 of 9 wonWins–lossesETFETF Tracker@TheETFTracker · theetftracker.comW or L and the margin in points a year, with payoutsWideSelected960 × 540

74 pictures in all · Back to Visualizations